Carroll v. Stewart et al

Filing 76

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail on 8/29/2016 to Defendants Bronkhorst & Hernandez signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. **6 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Michael Carroll, Prisoner ID: 626848)(MET)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 MICHAEL CARROLL, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. KELSEY STEWART, et. al., CASE NO. C15-5170 BHS-JRC ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ Defendants. 15 The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States 16 Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local 17 Magistrate Judge Rules MJR1, MJR3 and MJR4. 18 The Court directed service of the named defendants on September 15, 2015. Dkt. 34. On 19 October 29, 2015, the Court entered an order directing submission of service addresses for the 20 unserved defendants. Dkt. 41. On November 23, 2015 plaintiff provided the Court with an 21 address for unserved defendants Hernandez, Jackson, Mitchell and Rocky. Dkt. 45. On 22 December 3, 2015, the Court entered an order directing service of unserved defendants. Dkt. 47. 23 Plaintiff then moved for an extension to provide the Court with the addresses of unserved 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 1 1 defendants Rocky, Mitchell, Jackson and Hernandez. Dkt. 46. The Court granted plaintiff’s 2 extension on December 22, 2015. Dkt. 48. On June 30, 2016, plaintiff supplied the full name 3 for defendant Rocky (Rocky Bronkhorst). Dkt. 68. On July 7, 2016, defendants supplied the 4 address for defendant Rocky Bronkhurst and indicated that because defendant Hernandez was no 5 longer with the Department, defendants could produce his last known home address to the Court 6 under seal, Dkt. 70, and did so on August 5, 2016. Dkt. 75. 7 The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 8 (1) 9 Defendant’s motion for the Court to order service on Defendants Bronkhorst and Service by Clerk 10 Hernandez is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to send the following to Defendant Bronkhorst 11 at the Washington Corrections Center in Shelton, Washington by first class mail: a copy of 12 Plaintiff’s complaint, a copy of this Order, two copies of the notice of lawsuit and request for 13 waiver of service of summons, a waiver of service of summons, and a return envelope, postage 14 prepaid, addressed to the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk is directed to serve the complaint on 15 Defendant Juan Hernandez at the address separately provided to the Clerk under seal (Dkt. 75). 16 All waiver of service of summons forms, envelopes, and other documents containing Defendant 17 Hernandez’s address or other personally-identifying information are to be filed under seal to 18 the Court only. 19 (2) 20 Defendants Bronkhorst and Hernandez shall have thirty (30) days within which to return Response Required 21 the enclosed waiver of service of summons. A defendant who timely returns the signed waiver 22 shall have sixty (60) days after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an 23 answer to the complaint or a motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 2 1 Procedure. 2 A defendant who fails to timely return the signed waiver will be personally served with a 3 summons and complaint, and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to 4 Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A defendant who has been personally 5 served shall file an answer or motion permitted under Rule 12 within thirty (30) days after 6 service. 7 (3) 8 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents Filing and Service by Parties, Generally 9 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Counsel are directed to the Court’s website, 10 www.wawd.uscourts.gov, for a detailed description of the requirements for filing via CM/ECF. 11 All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or prisoners, may continue to file a paper original 12 with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed electronically or in traditional paper format, must 13 indicate in the upper right hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom the document 14 is directed. 15 For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty 16 (50) pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as 17 necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be 18 clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.” 19 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 20 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. 21 (4) 22 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. Motions, Generally 23 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 3 1 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 2 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 3 consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. 4 Stipulated and agreed motions, motions to file over-length motions or briefs, motions for 5 reconsideration, joint submissions pursuant to the option procedure established in LCR 37(a)(2), 6 motions for default, requests for the clerk to enter default judgment, and motions for the court to 7 enter default judgment where the opposing party has not appeared shall be noted for 8 consideration on the day they are filed. See LCR 7(d)(1). All other non-dispositive motions 9 shall be noted for consideration no earlier than the third Friday following filing and service of the 10 motion. See LCR 7(d)(3). All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier 11 than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the motion. Id. 12 For electronic filers, all briefs and affidavits in opposition to either a dispositive or non- 13 dispositive motion shall be filed and served not later than 11:59 p.m. on the Monday 14 immediately preceding the date designated for consideration of the motion. If a party (i.e. a pro 15 se litigant and/or prisoner) files a paper original, that opposition must be received in the Clerk’s 16 office by 4:30 p.m. on the Monday preceding the date of consideration. 17 The party making the motion may file and serve, not later than 11:59 p.m. (if filing 18 electronically) or 4:30 p.m. (if filing a paper original with the Clerk’s office) on the date 19 designated for consideration of the motion, a reply to the opposing party’s briefs and affidavits. 20 (5) 21 Parties filing motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment 22 Procedure and motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure should acquaint themselves with those rules. As noted above, these motions shall be 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 4 1 noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the 2 motion. 3 Defendants filing motions to dismiss or motions for summary judge are advised that they 4 MUST serve Rand and Wyatt notices concurrently with motions to dismiss and motions for 5 summary judgment so that pro se prisoner plaintiffs will have fair, timely and adequate notice of 6 what is required of them in order to oppose those motions. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 941 7 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth Circuit has set forth model language for such notices: 8 A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. 18 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added); see Wyatt v. Terhune, 19 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003) (extending the fair notice requirement to motions to 20 dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). 21 Defendants who fail to file and serve the required Rand and Wyatt notices on plaintiff 22 may have their motion stricken from the Court’s calendar with leave to re-file. 23 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 5 1 (6) Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge 2 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with 3 regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 4 Dated this 29th day of August, 2016. A 5 6 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS ROCKY BRONKHORST AND HERNANDEZ - 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?