Harris v. Obenland

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge J Richard Creatura directing respondent to file an answer. (MET) cc: petitioner

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 DAMIEN DARNELL HARRIS, 11 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE AN ANSWER, §2254 PETITION v. 12 13 MIKE OBENLAND, Respondent. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05191-RJB-JRC The District Court referred this petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The referral is made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4. In compliance with the Court’s order, petitioner has filed an amended petition (Dkt. 33). Accordingly, the Court orders that: (1) Within forty-five (45) days, respondent shall file and serve an answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. As part 23 24 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE AN ANSWER, §2254 PETITION - 1 1 of such answer, respondent shall state whether petitioner has exhausted available state remedies 2 and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. 3 Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing 4 cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of the 5 Court and serve a copy of the answer on petitioner. 6 (2) The Court will treat the answer in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face 7 of the answer, respondent shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing. 8 Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the 9 Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent(s) may file and serve a reply 10 not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 11 (3) 12 The Court requires all attorneys admitted to practice before this Court to file documents Filing by Parties. 13 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or 14 prisoners, may continue to file a paper original with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed 15 electronically or in traditional paper format, must indicate in the upper right hand corner the 16 name of the magistrate judge to whom the document is directed. 17 For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty 18 (50) pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as 19 necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be 20 clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.” 21 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 22 on all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. 23 (4) Motions. 24 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE AN ANSWER, §2254 PETITION - 2 1 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 2 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 3 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 4 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 5 consideration on the Court’s motion calendar. 6 (5) Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge 7 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with regard 8 to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 9 Dated this 22nd day of September, 2015. A 10 11 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE AN ANSWER, §2254 PETITION - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?