Bonds v. Glebe

Filing 31

ORDER granting 30 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Andre Bonds, Prisoner ID: 965879)(DN)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 ANDRE L BONDS, CASE NO. C15-5204 RBL 9 Petitioner, 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IFP v. 11 [DKT. #30] PATRICK GLEBE, 12 Respondent. 13 14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner Bonds’ Motion for Leave to Appeal in 15 forma pauperis. [Dkt. #30] This Court must determine whether his appeal is frivolous or taken in 16 bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c). 17 This Court adopted [Dkt. #26] Magistrate Judge Strombom’s Report [Dkt. #22] 18 recommending denial of Bonds’ petition for habeas relief, because he failed to show that the 19 state court’s rulings violated clearly established federal law. This Court also adopted the 20 Magistrate Judge’s recommendation to DENY Bond a certificate of appealability because he did 21 not make a substantial showing that he was denied a constitutional right. 22 A court should “deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis if it appears from the face of the 23 proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.” Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IFP - 1 1 Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir. 1987) (citations omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. 2 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). While Bonds’ claims are not viable, it cannot be said that they are frivolous, or 3 that he is acting in bad faith. His Motion [Dkt. #30] is therefore GRANTED; he shall be 4 permitted to appeal in forma pauperis. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated this 11th day of February, 2016. 8 A 9 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [DKT. #30] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?