Mitchell et al v. State of Washington et al

Filing 38

ORDER Defendant Sziebert's 33 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is denied as moot; and Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Extension of Time is granted. All discovery shall be completed by 8/19/2016. Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before 9/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel.(CMG)cc: Plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 GEORGE O. MITCHELL, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05226-RBL-DWC ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. WASHINGTON STATE SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER CHIEF MEDICAL DIRECTOR, DR. LESLIE SZIEBERT; WASHINGTON STATE SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER GALINA DIXON, ARNP, 16 Defendants. 17 18 The District Court has referred this action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to United 19 States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. Before the Court are Defendant Leslie Sziebert’s 20 Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 33) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 35). 21 Defendant Sziebert initially filed for an extension of the discovery period through August 1, 22 2016, but subsequently indicated he has no objection to Plaintiff’s proposed sixty-day extension 23 (Dkt. 36). Defendant Galina Dixon has not filed a response to either motion. 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 1 After consideration of the record, Plaintiff’s Motion is granted. The Pretrial Scheduling 2 Order (Dkt. 21) is amended as follows: 3 (1) All discovery shall be completed by August 19, 2016. 4 (2) Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before September 19, 5 2016. 6 Defendant Sziebert’s Motion is denied as moot. 7 Dated this 17th day of June, 2016. A 8 9 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?