Mitchell et al v. State of Washington et al
Filing
38
ORDER Defendant Sziebert's 33 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is denied as moot; and Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Extension of Time is granted. All discovery shall be completed by 8/19/2016. Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before 9/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel.(CMG)cc: Plaintiff
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
GEORGE O. MITCHELL,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05226-RBL-DWC
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
WASHINGTON STATE SPECIAL
COMMITMENT CENTER CHIEF
MEDICAL DIRECTOR, DR. LESLIE
SZIEBERT; WASHINGTON STATE
SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER
GALINA DIXON, ARNP,
16
Defendants.
17
18
The District Court has referred this action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to United
19 States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. Before the Court are Defendant Leslie Sziebert’s
20 Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 33) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 35).
21 Defendant Sziebert initially filed for an extension of the discovery period through August 1,
22 2016, but subsequently indicated he has no objection to Plaintiff’s proposed sixty-day extension
23 (Dkt. 36). Defendant Galina Dixon has not filed a response to either motion.
24
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
1
After consideration of the record, Plaintiff’s Motion is granted. The Pretrial Scheduling
2 Order (Dkt. 21) is amended as follows:
3
(1)
All discovery shall be completed by August 19, 2016.
4
(2)
Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before September 19,
5
2016.
6 Defendant Sziebert’s Motion is denied as moot.
7
Dated this 17th day of June, 2016.
A
8
9
David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?