Slack v. Wright et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 GRANTING Defendants Farr, Bauer, Mason, Sheridan, Coker, and Kuestermeyer's Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Edmister because it is time-barred; this matter is closed; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 4/13/2016 (DN). (cc to pltf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 TOMMIE SLACK, Plaintiff, 11 13 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. 12 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05270-RBL-DWC ELAINE FARR, ERIC BAUER, MASON, SHERIDAN, EDMISTER, ANGELLA COKER, CASSANDRA KUESTERMEYER, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. (2) Defendants Farr, Bauer, Mason, Sheridan, Coker, and Kuestermeyer’s Motion to Dismiss Judgment [Dkt. #42] is GRANTED. (3) Plaintiff Slack’s claim against Defendant Edmister sua sponte is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is time-barred. (4) The case is closed. 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 (5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and to the Hon. David W. Christel. 2 3 DATED this 13th day of April, 2016. 4 A 5 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?