CitiMortgage Inc v. Geddes et al

Filing 71

ORDER granting 53 Rob and Brandis Geddes's Motion for Attorney Fees; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 CITIMORTGAGE INC, CASE NO. 15-5293RBL 9 Plaintiff, 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. 11 SHIRLEY J GEDDES, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Rob and Brandis Geddes’s Motion for 15 Attorney Fees [Dkt. #53]. The Geddeses argue that as the prevailing party, they are entitled to 16 $200 in statutory attorney fees under RCW 4.84.010 and RCW 4.84.080. CitiMortgage does not 17 oppose their motion. 18 In a diversity case, state law governs a request for attorney fees made under Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2). See Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc’y, 421 U.S. 240, 20 259 n. 31, 95 S. Ct. 1612 (1975); see also People of Sioux Cty v. Nat’l Surety Co., 276 U.S. 238, 21 243, 48 S Ct. 239 (1928); MRO Commc’ns, Inc. v. AT&T Co., 197 F.3d 1276, 1281 (9th Cir. 22 1999). Washington law awards a prevailing party $200 in statutory attorney fees. RCW 23 4.84.010(6); RCW 4.84.080(1). 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 1 1 Rob and Brandis were the prevailing party. See Dkt. #51, Order Dismissing 2 CitiMortgage’s Claims; see also Dkt. #67, Order Entering Judgment for Rob and Brandis. 3 Therefore, their Motion for Attorney Fees [Dkt. #53] is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter a 4 supplemental judgment awarding Rob and Brandis $200 in statutory attorney fees. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated this 29th day of March, 2016. 8 A 9 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?