Piper v. Colvin

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(KMP)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 RAYMOND H. PIPER, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:15-cv-5611 BAT ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees of $16,977.50, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. 25. Defendant is not opposed to the motion. Dkt. 26. The Court previously awarded Plaintiff’s attorney a fee of $7,772.91 pursuant to the 17 Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). Dkt. 24. However, $4,876.46 of the EAJA award was 18 garnished to pay Plaintiff’s debts, leaving a balance of $2,896.45 paid to Plaintiff’s attorney. 19 Dkt. 25, Exhibit E. Following remand and a second hearing, the ALJ awarded past due disability 20 benefits to Plaintiff in the amount of $95,910.00. Dkt. 25, Exhibit A. 21 Plaintiff requests the net sum of $16,977.50, which represents 25% of past due benefits 22 awarded ($95,910.00 x 25% = $23,977.50), less $2,896.45 (EAJA fees previously received after 23 garnishment), less $4,103.55 (additional voluntary reduction). Id.; Exhibits A-E. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 1 1 Having considered Plaintiff’s request, Respondent’s non-opposition, and all documents in 2 support thereof, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff’s attorney Eitan Kassel Yanich is 3 awarded $16,977.50. Social Security is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney the amount 4 $16,977.50, minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. After paying the attorney 5 fees, Social Security shall release all remaining funds directly to Plaintiff. 6 7 8 DATED this 6th day of October, 2017. A BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?