Piper v. Colvin
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(KMP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
RAYMOND H. PIPER,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-5611 BAT
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees of $16,977.50, pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. 25. Defendant is not opposed to the motion. Dkt. 26.
The Court previously awarded Plaintiff’s attorney a fee of $7,772.91 pursuant to the
17
Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). Dkt. 24. However, $4,876.46 of the EAJA award was
18
garnished to pay Plaintiff’s debts, leaving a balance of $2,896.45 paid to Plaintiff’s attorney.
19
Dkt. 25, Exhibit E. Following remand and a second hearing, the ALJ awarded past due disability
20
benefits to Plaintiff in the amount of $95,910.00. Dkt. 25, Exhibit A.
21
Plaintiff requests the net sum of $16,977.50, which represents 25% of past due benefits
22
awarded ($95,910.00 x 25% = $23,977.50), less $2,896.45 (EAJA fees previously received after
23
garnishment), less $4,103.55 (additional voluntary reduction). Id.; Exhibits A-E.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 1
1
Having considered Plaintiff’s request, Respondent’s non-opposition, and all documents in
2
support thereof, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff’s attorney Eitan Kassel Yanich is
3
awarded $16,977.50. Social Security is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney the amount
4
$16,977.50, minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. After paying the attorney
5
fees, Social Security shall release all remaining funds directly to Plaintiff.
6
7
8
DATED this 6th day of October, 2017.
A
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?