Irby v. Haynes et al

Filing 41

ORDER finding as moot 29 Motion Clarification/Request signed by Judge J Richard Creatura.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Terrance Irby, Prisoner ID: 631794)(MET)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION v. 13 CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05484-BHS-JRC PAT GLEBE, et al., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Defendants. The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura. The Court’s authority for the referral is 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for clarification. Dkt. 29. Although the basis for plaintiff’s motion is not clear, the Court interprets plaintiff’s request for clarification as a request to serve his first amended complaint (Dkt. 19). Plaintiff states that he is seeking “assistance of the state contract attorneys office of Jean Schidler-Brown and Associates P.S. 606 Post Ave Suite 101 Seattle WA, 98104 for the purpose of proper service of summons and complaint.” Id. Plaintiff also states he seeks service upon the Washington Attorney General’s office. Id. 24 ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION - 1 1 However, the Court has already ordered service of plaintiff’s first amended complaint on 2 all named defendants and the Washington Attorney General’s office (Dkt. 30). Thus, plaintiff’s 3 motion is denied as moot. To the extent that plaintiff seeks to contact Ms. Brown, Ms. Brown has 4 not entered an appearance in this case and thus, plaintiff must contact her directly without 5 assistance from the Court. 6 Dated this 28th day of December, 2015. A 7 8 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?