Conquest Innovations LLC v The SkyLIFE Company Inc

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration.(TG)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

6
7

8 CONQUEST INNOVATIONS, LLC,
9

Plaintiff,

10

v.

11 THE SKYLIFE COMPANY, INC.,
12

CASE NO. C15-5697 BHS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

Defendant.

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Conquest Innovations, LLC’s

15 (“Conquest”) motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 32).
16

On January 26, 2016, the Court issued an order stating in relevant part that

17 Conquest had failed to allege diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 31. On January 28, 2016,
18 Conquest filed a motion for reconsideration directing the Court’s attention to the
19 amended complaint, which specifically alleges diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 32. The Court
20 overlooked the amended complaint and based its conclusion on the original complaint.
21 The Court, however, finds no reason to vacate or reconsider the order as the mistaken
22

ORDER - 1

1 allegation does not affect the ultimate conclusion to stay this action pending
2 reexamination of the patent in suit. Therefore, the Court DENIES Conquest’s motion.
3

Dated this 28th day of January, 2016.

A

4
5

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2