Buzzard v. ISRB/CCB et al
Filing
60
ORDER denying 58 Motion for Waiver of Past Fees, signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. The matter remains closed. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ronald Buzzard, Prisoner ID: 846650)(KMC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8
RONALD BUZZARD JR,
Plaintiff,
9
10
CASE NO. C15-5874BHS
ORDER
v.
11
ISRB/CRC, LYNN DELANO,
TOMSAHLBERG, DENNIS THAUT,
BETSYHOLLINGSWORTH,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Ronald Buzzard’s “Motion
for Waiver of Past Fees.” Dkt. 58. Buzzard was incarcerated when he filed at least four
pro se cases in this court, seeking and obtaining in each the right to proceed in forma
pauperis. See Buzzard v. Wash. Dep’t of Corrections et al., 12-cv-5047BHS; Buzzard et
al. v. ISRB, 14-cv-959RSL; Buzzard v. ISRB/CCB et al., 15-cv-5874BHS; and Buzzard v.
State of Wash. et al., 20-cv-1559RAJ. Buzzard acknowledged and this Court ordered that,
consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), Buzzard would be required to re-pay the full filing
fee over time, through deductions from his prison account. Dkt. 1 at 3; Dkt. 6 at 2.
22
23
24
ORDER - 1
1
Buzzard remains incarcerated. He claims that between Legal Financial
2
Obligations, treatment costs, and the filing fees, the Department of Corrections takes
3
“95% of his money.” He also alleges he has outstanding consumer debt, supports his
4
parents, and is indigent. He claims he will never be able pay off his filing fees and asks
5
the Court to waive his remaining repayment obligations in each of these cases.
6
It is true that district courts routinely waive filing fees for indigent pro se plaintiffs
7
by granting them in forma pauperis status under 28 U.SC. § 1915(a)(1), provided they
8
state a plausible claim. Buzzard argues it does not make sense to force prisoners to pay
9
the entire filing fee over time when they too are indigent (and have minimal opportunity
10
to change that fact), and his position is not unreasonable. But Congress addressed this
11
directly in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), which requires prisoners proceeding in forma pauperis to
12
re-pay the filing fee from funds in their prison trust accounts. This requirement was part
13
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which was designed to reduce prisoner litigation.
14
See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (the “three strikes” provision).
15
Congress did not provide for a waiver of such filing fees.
16
Therefore, Buzzard’s Motion for Waiver of Past Fees, Dkt. 58, is DENIED. The
17
matter remains closed.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED
19
Dated this 7th day of June, 2021.
20
21
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
22
23
24
A
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?