Davis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
Filing
109
ORDER directing the Clerk to RE-NOTE the MOTIONS for Summary Judgment ( 59 , 92 ) to 6/9/2017. The Court notes the deadlines for filing opposition and reply papers are not extended and no additional filings will be considered. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (CMG)(cc mailed to Plaintiff)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
9
KEITH ADAIR DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
14
15
v.
WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
et al.,
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05129-BHS-DWC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RENOTE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
The District Court has referred this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action to United States Magistrate
16 Judge David W. Christel. Currently pending before the Court are two Motions for Summary
17 Judgment filed on behalf of all Defendants. See Dkt. 59, 92. The Motions became ready for the
18 Court’s consideration on May 12, 2017. See Dkt. 90, 102. On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed an
19 objection to an Order denying his Motion to Compel. See Dkt. 104. If the Honorable Benjamin
20 H. Settle, the District Judge assigned to this case, grants Plaintiff’s objection, the Motions for
21 Summary Judgment will no longer be ready for consideration.
22
As Judge Settle’s decision on Plaintiff’s objection may impact the Court’s ability to
23 consider the Motions for Summary Judgment, the Court directs the Clerk to re-note the Motions
24
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RE-NOTE
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1
1 for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 59, 92) for June 9, 2017. The Court notes the deadlines for filing
2 opposition and rely papers is not extended and no additional filings will be considered.
3
Dated this 23rd day of May, 2017.
A
4
5
David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RE-NOTE
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?