Santacruz et al v. Southbank Dairies LLC et al

Filing 54

ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION re 53 . Discovery deadline extended to 2/21/2017. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ Camas address . Modified on 2/2/2017 (JL).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 12 13 VICTOR SANTACRUZ, LUIS SANTACRUZ, CIRILO MANCINAS LOPEZ, RAYMUNDO MARTINEZ, LUCIA GARCIA, and WILLIAM ALCANTAR, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 CASE NO. C16-5200 RJB ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION v. SOUTHBANK DAIRIES, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, and JERRY D. FOSTER, an individual, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on a pleading filed January 27, 2017 entitled 20 “Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Discovery Deadline and to Take Deposition.” Dkt. 21 53. The Court has considered the pleading, the remaining record, and is fully advised. 22 Filed March 16, 2016, this case arises from Plaintiffs’ employment at Defendants’ dairy 23 farm. Dkt. 1. In their First Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs assert that they did not receive all 24 ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION- 1 1 wages due, suffered uncompensated physical injuries, and experienced racial discrimination. 2 Dkt. 26. Plaintiffs make claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 206, et seq., the 3 Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1802 et seq., and make 4 state law claims under Washington’s wage and hours laws, for discrimination in violation of 5 Washington’s Law Against Discrimination, RCW 49.60, et seq., for breach of contract, and for 6 fraudulent concealment. Id. Plaintiffs’ “deliberate intent to injure/personal injury” claims were 7 dismissed. Dkt. 33. 8 9 FACTS On November 30, 2016, Defendants’ counsel filed a motion to withdraw as attorneys of 10 record for the Defendants. Dkt. 44. Counsel notified the Defendants of the need to comply with 11 Local Rule W.D. Wash. 83.2(b)(3). Id. The motion was noted for December 16, 2016. Id. 12 That same day, on November 30, 2016, Defendant Southbank Dairies, LLC was also 13 notified by the Court that pursuant to Local Rule W.D. Wash. 83.2(b)(3), it must be represented 14 by counsel. Dkt. 46. Defendant Southbank Dairies, LLC was cautioned that it must retain 15 counsel or risk an entry of default against it as to Plaintiffs’ claims. Id. It was given until 16 December 16, 2016 to secure counsel and notified that “failure to do so may result in an entry of 17 default against Southbank Dairies, LLC.” 18 Defendants’ counsels’ motion to withdraw was granted on December 19, 2016. Dkt. 47 19 To date, no attorney has appeared for Defendant Southbank Dairies, LLC. 20 On January 27, 2017, the pleading entitled “Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding 21 Discovery Deadline and to take Deposition” was filed. Dkt. 53. This pleading was filed on 22 behalf of Plaintiffs, through counsel. Id. It also purports to be filed by “Defendants Southbank 23 Dairies, LLC and Jerry D. Foster . . . by and through their undersigned representative.” Id. 24 ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION- 2 1 Defendant Foster signed this pleading. Id. This pleading requests an extension of time of the 2 discovery deadline to February 21, 2017 for the limited purpose of taking the deposition of Judy 3 Stratton and the Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition of Southbank Dairies, LLC. Id. 4 DISCUSSION 5 Local Rule W.D. Wash. 83.2(b)(3) provides: 6 A business entity, except a sole proprietorship, must be represented by counsel. If the attorney for a business entity, except a sole proprietorship, is seeking to withdraw, the attorney shall certify to the court that he or she has advised the business entity that it is required by law to be represented by an attorney admitted to practice before this court and that failure to obtain a replacement attorney by the date the withdrawal is effective may result in the dismissal of the business entity’s claims for failure to prosecute and/or entry of default against the business entity as to any claims of other parties. 7 8 9 10 11 No motion for default has been filed against Southbank Dairies, LLC, so it is still an 12 active defendant in this matter. To date, however, Southbank Dairies, LLC has not retained 13 counsel. Defendant Foster is not an attorney admitted to practice before this court. Accordingly, 14 Defendant Foster cannot represent Southbank Dairies, LLC in any way in this case, including 15 attempting to file pleadings on its behalf. 16 As a result, the January 27, 2017 pleading (Dkt. 53) shall be construed as a motion for 17 extension of time between Plaintiffs and Defendant Foster. (It is not a stipulation because not all 18 parties have endorsed it.) They should be given their extension of the discovery deadline from 19 January 30, 2017 to February 21, 2017. All other deadlines remain in place. 20 ORDER 21 22 23 24 It is ORDERED that:  Plaintiffs’ and Defendant Foster’s motion for an extension of the discovery deadline to February 21, 2017 (Dkt. 53) IS GRANTED. ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION- 3 1 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 2 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 3 4 5 6 Dated this 2nd day of February, 2017. A ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON PLEADING ENTITLED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO TAKE DEPOSITION- 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?