Sanchez vs. John Doe et al

Filing 17

ORDER entered re 13 Motion to Amend signed by Judge David W. Christel. The Clerk is directed to replace Defendant John Doe Cornwell with Defendant Michael Cornwell. Plaintiff is not required to file an amended complaint. (MET) cc: plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 JOSEPH FLORES SANCHEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, MARGARET GILBERT, JANE 1-3 DOE, DENNIS CHERRY, JOHN DOE CORNWELL, CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05201-BHS-DWC ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. 1. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to 20 File Amended Complaint” (“Motion”). Dkt. 13. In his Motion, Plaintiff requests Defendant John 21 Doe Cornwell be changed to Michael Cornwell in the heading of his Amended Complaint in 22 order to properly serve Defendant Cornwell. Id. A review of the docket shows, Michael 23 Cornwell returned the waiver of service form mailed to “John Doe Cornwell.” See Dkt. 16. 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1 1 Therefore, Defendant Michael Cornwell has received a copy of the Amended Complaint and has 2 agreed to waive service. 3 Plaintiff’s Motion is granted as follows: The Clerk is directed to replace Defendant John 4 Doe Cornwell with Defendant Michael Cornwell. As the parties appear to agree the defendant 5 referenced in the Amended Complaint is Defendant Michael Cornwell, Plaintiff is not required to 6 file an amended complaint substituting Michael Cornwell for John Doe Cornwell. 7 Dated this 26th day of May, 2016. A 8 9 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?