Malone et al v. Strong

Filing 111

ORDER Granting 106 Motion to Extend Deadline and Add Parties, signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. The deadline to add parties is extended and the following individuals are hereby added as plaintiffs to this case: Ricardo Capello, William E Duncan, Donald Gamer, James Moseley, Robert Sheaffer and Barry Taylor. (GMR)

Download PDF
1 Honorable Ronald B. Leighton Honorable David W. Christel 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 CALVIN MALONE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 MARK STRONG and BILL VAN HOOK, 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 16-CV-05284-RBL-DWC ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE AND ADDING PARTIES 15 THIS MATTER having come on before this Court on the plaintiffs’ motion 16 17 (Dkt. 106) for an order extending the deadline to add parties and adding parties as 18 plaintiffs herein and defendants’ response (Dkt. 110) indicating they do not oppose 19 the motion; the Court having determined that the request is justified and appropriate, 20 21 and the Court deeming itself fully advised in this matter, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby 22 ** 23 ** 24 25 ** ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE AND ADDING PARTIES - 1 HESTER LAW GROUP, INC., P.S. 1008 SOUTH YAKIMA AVENUE, SUITE 302 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98405 (253) 272-2157 ORDERED that the deadline to add parties be extended and the following 1 2 individuals be and are hereby added as plaintiffs to this case: Ricardo Capello William E. Duncan Donald Gamer James Moseley Robert Sheaffer Barry Taylor 3 4 5 6 DATED this 2nd day of October, 2018. 7 8 A 9 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 HESTER LAW GROUP, INC., P.S. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 By: 16 17 /s/ Casey M. Arbenz Casey M. Arbenz WSB #40581 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE AND ADDING PARTIES - 2 HESTER LAW GROUP, INC., P.S. 1008 SOUTH YAKIMA AVENUE, SUITE 302 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98405 (253) 272-2157

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?