Becker v. Carney et al
Filing
225
ORDER ADOPTING 219 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. # 199 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims are dismissed with prejudice except the § 1983 claim that Joe Williamson retaliated against Plaintiff. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 211 ) is DENIED as untimely. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (MW)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ASHER J. BECKER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:16-cv-05315-RSM-JRC
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
v.
BRENT CARNEY, et al.,
Defendants.
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J.
15
Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiff and
16
Defendants, Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s objections, and the remaining record, hereby
17
finds and ORDERS:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(1) Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #199) is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART. All claims are dismissed with prejudice except the § 1983
claim that Joe Williamson retaliated against Plaintiff.
(2) Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #211) is DENIED as
untimely.
(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this order to Plaintiff and Judge Creatura.
26
27
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
2
DATED this 14th day of September, 2020.
3
4
5
6
7
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?