Hussey v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER ON REMAND by Judge Karen L Strombom. (TW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 MICHELLE M. HUSSEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 3:16-CV-05635 KLS 13 ORDER ON REMAND CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner’s final decision be reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Upon remand to the Commissioner of Social Security, the Appeals Council will remand this case to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to: (1) further develop the record, hold a de novo hearing, and issue a new decision; (2) further evaluate Plaintiff’s impairments under listing 12.05C; (3) further evaluate and weigh the opinion evidence of record; (4) reevaluate Plaintiff’s maximum residual functional capacity, and in so doing, reevaluate Plaintiff’s symptoms in accordance with SSR 16-3p; and (5) if warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence. 24 Page 1 ORDER - [3:16-CV-05635] 1 This case is reversed and remanded to the ALJ on the above grounds pursuant to sentence 2 four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff’s 3 application for costs and attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 4 5 DATED this 11th day of October, 2016. 6 A 7 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Presented by: s/ Kathryn A. Miller KATHRYN A. MILLER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2240 Fax: (206) 615-2531 kathryn.a.miller@ssa.gov 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER - [3:16-CV-05635]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?