Thompson v Colvin

Filing 9

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Judge Karen L Strombom. Attorney David B. Condon terminated. (MET) cc: plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TIMOTHY CHARLES THOMPSON, Social Security Number: 442-60-0138 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-05442 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY DAVID B. CONDON TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Defendant. THIS MATTER, having come before the Court upon David B. Condon’s Motion to 13 Withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff pursuant to LCR 83.2(b)(1), and it appearing that counsel and 14 plaintiff have been served and that plaintiff agrees to proceed pro se while seeking new counsel, and 15 no objections being raised, the Court does hereby 16 17 ORDER that the Motion by David B. Condon to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiff is granted. All future notices and correspondence shall be directed to: 18 19 20 Timothy Thompson 859 S 78th St Tacoma, WA 98408-5325 253-306-7461 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED this 6th day of July, 2016. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY DAVID B. CONDON FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Timothy Charles Thompson vs. Commissioner of Social Security Page 1 WELCH & CONDON POST OFFICE BOX 1318 1109 TACOMA AVE SOUTH TACOMA, WA 98402 (253) 383-3427 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presented by: _/s/ David B. Condon______________ DAVID B. CONDON / WSBA 5578 Attorney for Plaintiffs Welch & Condon 1109 Tacoma Avenue South PO Box 1318 Tacoma, WA 98401-1318 (253) 383-3427 (voice) (253) 572-8957 (fax) email: dave@welchcondon.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY DAVID B. CONDON FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Timothy Charles Thompson vs. Commissioner of Social Security Page 2 WELCH & CONDON POST OFFICE BOX 1318 1109 TACOMA AVE SOUTH TACOMA, WA 98402 (253) 383-3427

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?