Dahl v Mason County et al
Filing
161
ORDER on STIPULATION re 160 Stipulated MOTION to Approve Settlement and Dismiss; this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys' fees; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
1
Hon. Ronald B. Leighton
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
9
KEITH DAHL, in his Personal Capacity and as
Personal Representative of the Estate of
BRANDON DAHL, deceased,
10
v.
12
MASON COUNTY, et al.,
13
STIPULATED MOTION AND
ORDER TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS
CASE
Plaintiff,
11
NO. 3:16-cv-05719-RBL
Defendants.
14
I.
INTRODUCTION
15
Plaintiff, KEITH DAHL, in his personal capacity and as personal representative of the
16
Estate of Brandon Dahl; Defendants MASON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of
17
Washington; GARY HAUGEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of TOM HAUGEN,
18
deceased; CASEY SALISBURY; ANGELA LANGSTON; JOSEPH OTT; BRAD MCQUADE;
19
and MATT GRAY (collectively “County Defendants”); and Defendant HEALTH CARE
20
DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. (“HDS”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their counsel
21
of record, respectfully request the Court approve a settlement agreement reached between the
22
Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms
23
set forth in the Settlement Guardian ad Litem Report (“GAL Report”).
24
25
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 1
Galanda Broadman PLLC
8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1
Mailing: P.O. Box 15146
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 557-7509
1
II.
RELIEF REQUESTED
2
The Parties respectfully request that the Court issue an order approving the settlement
3
agreement reached between the Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further
4
costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report.
5
III.
EVIDENCE RELIED UPON
6
This Stipulated Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss (“Motion”) is based upon the
7
Settlement GAL Report on file with this Court, which, in turn, is based on: (1) a Release and Hold
8
Harmless Agreement between Mr. Dahl, in his Personal Capacity and as Personal Representative
9
of the Estate of Brandon Dahl, and the County Defendants; (2) a Settlement Agreement and Release
10
between Mr. Dahl, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brandon Dahl, and HDS; and (3) a
11
Mediation Settlement Agreement between the Parties (collectively “Settlement Agreements”).
12
IV.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
13
On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants alleging negligence and
14
violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Parties have since negotiated a global settlement of all claims
15
against all Defendants. The terms of the global settlement are provided in the Settlement GAL
16
Report.
17
On May 25, 2017, the Court appointed Michael B. Smith, to serve as Guardian ad Litem
18
(“GAL”) for BD, a minor. Mr. Smith participated in mediation, reviewed each of the Settlement
19
Agreements, and prepared a Settlement GAL Report, which he filed with the Court under seal on
20
October 9, 2018 (Dkt. 159). The Settlement GAL Report recommends that this Court approve the
21
terms of the Settlement Agreements, finding the Parties’ settlement a fair and reasonable
22
compromise.
23
24
25
V.
AUTHORITY & ARGUMENT
The Parties respectfully request that the Court approve the settlement and dismiss this case
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 2
Galanda Broadman PLLC
8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1
Mailing: P.O. Box 15146
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 557-7509
1
with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement
2
GAL Report.
3
The Court’s approval of the settlement is appropriate because the settlement terms
4
negotiated between the Parties are “fundamentally fair, adequate, and reasonable.” United States
5
v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 580 (9th Cir. 1990). Here, the Parties agree that the Settlement
6
Agreements are fair, adequate, and reasonable. Further, the GAL has approved the settlement and
7
specifically found that it is a fair and reasonable compromise. Accordingly, the Court’s approval
8
of the settlement, and related dismissal of this case, is appropriate.
9
VI.
CONCLUSION
10
For the reasons set forth above, the Parties respectfully request that the Court approve the
11
settlement reached between the Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further
12
costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report.
13
DATED this 11th day of October 2018.
14
WILLIAMS, KASTNER
15
s/Heidi Mandt
Heidi Mandt, WSBA #26880
1515 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 600
Portland, Oregon 97201
Attorney for Defendants Healthcare Delivery
Systems
Phone: (503) 228-7967
Email: hmandt@williamskastner.com
16
17
18
19
GALANDA BROADMAN
20
s/ Gabriel S. Galanda
Ryan Dreveskracht, WSBA No. 42593
Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA No. 30331
Attorneys for Plaintiff
P.O. Box 15146
Seattle, WA 98115
Tel: (206) 557-7509
Email: ryan@galandabroadman.com
gabe@galandabroadman.com
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 3
Galanda Broadman PLLC
8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1
Mailing: P.O. Box 15146
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 557-7509
1
2
LAW LYMAN DANIEL KAMERRER &
BOGDANOVICH PS
3
4
/Guy Bogdanovich
Guy Bogdanovich, WSBA No. 14777
Attorney for Mason County Defendants
P.O. Box 11880, Olympia, WA 98508-1880
Telephone: (360) 754-3480
Email: gbogdanovich@lldkb.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
Having considered the Motion, Settlement GAL Report, and other materials, the Court
12
hereby approves the settlement on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report and dismisses
13
this case with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated this 12th day of October, 2018 .
16
17
18
A
19
Ronald B. Leighton
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 4
Galanda Broadman PLLC
8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1
Mailing: P.O. Box 15146
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 557-7509
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?