Dahl v Mason County et al

Filing 161

ORDER on STIPULATION re 160 Stipulated MOTION to Approve Settlement and Dismiss; this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys' fees; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)

Download PDF
1 Hon. Ronald B. Leighton 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 KEITH DAHL, in his Personal Capacity and as Personal Representative of the Estate of BRANDON DAHL, deceased, 10 v. 12 MASON COUNTY, et al., 13 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS CASE Plaintiff, 11 NO. 3:16-cv-05719-RBL Defendants. 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff, KEITH DAHL, in his personal capacity and as personal representative of the 16 Estate of Brandon Dahl; Defendants MASON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of 17 Washington; GARY HAUGEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of TOM HAUGEN, 18 deceased; CASEY SALISBURY; ANGELA LANGSTON; JOSEPH OTT; BRAD MCQUADE; 19 and MATT GRAY (collectively “County Defendants”); and Defendant HEALTH CARE 20 DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. (“HDS”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their counsel 21 of record, respectfully request the Court approve a settlement agreement reached between the 22 Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms 23 set forth in the Settlement Guardian ad Litem Report (“GAL Report”). 24 25 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 1 Galanda Broadman PLLC 8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1 Mailing: P.O. Box 15146 Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 557-7509 1 II. RELIEF REQUESTED 2 The Parties respectfully request that the Court issue an order approving the settlement 3 agreement reached between the Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further 4 costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report. 5 III. EVIDENCE RELIED UPON 6 This Stipulated Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss (“Motion”) is based upon the 7 Settlement GAL Report on file with this Court, which, in turn, is based on: (1) a Release and Hold 8 Harmless Agreement between Mr. Dahl, in his Personal Capacity and as Personal Representative 9 of the Estate of Brandon Dahl, and the County Defendants; (2) a Settlement Agreement and Release 10 between Mr. Dahl, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brandon Dahl, and HDS; and (3) a 11 Mediation Settlement Agreement between the Parties (collectively “Settlement Agreements”). 12 IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS 13 On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants alleging negligence and 14 violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Parties have since negotiated a global settlement of all claims 15 against all Defendants. The terms of the global settlement are provided in the Settlement GAL 16 Report. 17 On May 25, 2017, the Court appointed Michael B. Smith, to serve as Guardian ad Litem 18 (“GAL”) for BD, a minor. Mr. Smith participated in mediation, reviewed each of the Settlement 19 Agreements, and prepared a Settlement GAL Report, which he filed with the Court under seal on 20 October 9, 2018 (Dkt. 159). The Settlement GAL Report recommends that this Court approve the 21 terms of the Settlement Agreements, finding the Parties’ settlement a fair and reasonable 22 compromise. 23 24 25 V. AUTHORITY & ARGUMENT The Parties respectfully request that the Court approve the settlement and dismiss this case STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 2 Galanda Broadman PLLC 8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1 Mailing: P.O. Box 15146 Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 557-7509 1 with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement 2 GAL Report. 3 The Court’s approval of the settlement is appropriate because the settlement terms 4 negotiated between the Parties are “fundamentally fair, adequate, and reasonable.” United States 5 v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 580 (9th Cir. 1990). Here, the Parties agree that the Settlement 6 Agreements are fair, adequate, and reasonable. Further, the GAL has approved the settlement and 7 specifically found that it is a fair and reasonable compromise. Accordingly, the Court’s approval 8 of the settlement, and related dismissal of this case, is appropriate. 9 VI. CONCLUSION 10 For the reasons set forth above, the Parties respectfully request that the Court approve the 11 settlement reached between the Parties and dismiss this case with prejudice and without further 12 costs or attorneys’ fees on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report. 13 DATED this 11th day of October 2018. 14 WILLIAMS, KASTNER 15 s/Heidi Mandt Heidi Mandt, WSBA #26880 1515 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, Oregon 97201 Attorney for Defendants Healthcare Delivery Systems Phone: (503) 228-7967 Email: hmandt@williamskastner.com 16 17 18 19 GALANDA BROADMAN 20 s/ Gabriel S. Galanda Ryan Dreveskracht, WSBA No. 42593 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA No. 30331 Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 15146 Seattle, WA 98115 Tel: (206) 557-7509 Email: ryan@galandabroadman.com gabe@galandabroadman.com 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 3 Galanda Broadman PLLC 8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1 Mailing: P.O. Box 15146 Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 557-7509 1 2 LAW LYMAN DANIEL KAMERRER & BOGDANOVICH PS 3 4 /Guy Bogdanovich Guy Bogdanovich, WSBA No. 14777 Attorney for Mason County Defendants P.O. Box 11880, Olympia, WA 98508-1880 Telephone: (360) 754-3480 Email: gbogdanovich@lldkb.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER Having considered the Motion, Settlement GAL Report, and other materials, the Court 12 hereby approves the settlement on the terms set forth in the Settlement GAL Report and dismisses 13 this case with prejudice and without further costs or attorneys’ fees. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated this 12th day of October, 2018 . 16 17 18 A 19 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS - 4 Galanda Broadman PLLC 8606 35th Avenue NE, Ste. L1 Mailing: P.O. Box 15146 Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 557-7509

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?