Morton v. Johanson et al

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Robert J. Bryan VACATING the 62 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and 63 Judgment; and Renoting the (Plaintiff's 64 OBJECTIONS to) 58 Report and Recommendation to 4/27/2018. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Cecil Morton, Prisoner ID: 725136)(SP)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 12 13 CECIL MORTON, CASE NO. 3:16-cv-05728-RJB Plaintiff, v. VANESA JOHANSON, 14 Defendant. ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT AND RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon review of the file. By no fault of Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s Objection (Dkt. 64), which Plaintiff emailed on February 23, 2018, was not docketed until April 11, 2018, a date after the Court issued the Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) and Judgment (Dkt. 63), on April 9, 2018. The Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) and Judgment (Dkt. 63) are HEREBY VACATED. 23 24 ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT AND RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 Pursuant to LCR 72(b), the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 58) is HEREBY 2 RENOTED to Friday, April 27, 2018. Defendant’s Response to the Objections shall be filed by 3 Thursday, April 26, 2018. No Reply by Plaintiff shall be considered. Local Civil Rule 72(b). 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 6 7 8 9 10 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. Dated this 12th day of April, 2018. A ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT AND RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?