Morton v. Johanson et al
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Robert J. Bryan VACATING the 62 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and 63 Judgment; and Renoting the (Plaintiff's 64 OBJECTIONS to) 58 Report and Recommendation to 4/27/2018. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Cecil Morton, Prisoner ID: 725136)(SP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
12
13
CECIL MORTON,
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-05728-RJB
Plaintiff,
v.
VANESA JOHANSON,
14
Defendant.
ORDER VACATING ORDER
ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
JUDGMENT AND RENOTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon review of the file.
By no fault of Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s Objection (Dkt. 64), which Plaintiff emailed on
February 23, 2018, was not docketed until April 11, 2018, a date after the Court issued the Order
Adopting Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) and Judgment (Dkt. 63), on April 9, 2018.
The Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) and Judgment (Dkt. 63) are
HEREBY VACATED.
23
24
ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT AND
RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
Pursuant to LCR 72(b), the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 58) is HEREBY
2
RENOTED to Friday, April 27, 2018. Defendant’s Response to the Objections shall be filed by
3
Thursday, April 26, 2018. No Reply by Plaintiff shall be considered. Local Civil Rule 72(b).
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and
6
7
8
9
10
to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.
Dated this 12th day of April, 2018.
A
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND JUDGMENT AND
RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?