Brenneman v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER on EAJA Fees and Costs re parties' 21 Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION REDITHA D. BRENNEMAN, ) Civil No. 3:16-cv-05740-RSM ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER FOR EAJA FEES AND ) COSTS NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security ) ) Defendant ) ____________________________________)_______________________________________________ It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $6,066.20, and expenses in the amount of $6.80 (postage), for a total of $6,073.00, shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal 21 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and that costs in the amount of $416.00 (court filing 22 $400.00, photocopies $16.00) should be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. See Astrue 23 24 v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees 25 26 shall be made payable to Teal M. Parham, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to 27 Plaintiff’s attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Teal M. Parham at 28 910 12th Avenue - PO Box 757, Longview, WA 98632. ORDER FOR EAJA FEES & COSTS [3:16-cv-05740-RSM] -1 1 2 DATED this 22 day of August 2017. 3 4 5 6 A 7 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presented by: s/TEAL M. PARHAM Teal M. Parham WSB #21954 Attorney for Plaintiff Parham & Hall, PLLP 910 12th Avenue Longview WA 98632 Telephone: (360) 423-3810 Fax: (360) 423-3812 E-mail: tealparham@parhamhall.com 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER FOR EAJA FEES & COSTS [3:16-cv-05740-RSM] -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?