Simonelli v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER granting 17 MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FEES, EXPENSES AND COSTS - by Judge David W. Christel.(SH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 10 NOEL A. SIMONELLI, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, CASE NO. 3:16-cv-05803 DWC ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FEES, EXPENSES AND COSTS 14 Defendant. 15 16 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local 17 Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13. See also Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate 18 Judge, Dkt. 4. This matter is before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 19 under EAJA.” Dkt. 17. 20 Based on the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (“EAJA”), Plaintiff’s 21 motion and attorney time itemization (Dkt. 17), and the relevant record, the Court orders EAJA 22 attorney’s fees of $6,358.44, expenses of $10.68, and costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, of 23 $400.00, for a total of $6,769.12 (“EAJA Award”) be awarded to Plaintiff. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 24 U.S. 586, 591–97 (2010). ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FEES, EXPENSES AND COSTS - 1 1 The Acting Commissioner shall contact the Department of Treasury after this Order is 2 entered to determine if the EAJA Award is subject to any offset. If there is an offset, any 3 remainder shall be made payable to Plaintiff, based on the Department of the Treasury’s Offset 4 Program and standard practices. Any check for the EAJA Award shall be made payable to 5 Plaintiff, Noel Simonelli, and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Todd R. Renda, 6413 19th Street 6 West, Suite 21, Tacoma, WA 98466-6223. 7 Dated this 31st day of May, 2017. A 8 9 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FEES, EXPENSES AND COSTS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?