Reesman v. Haynes
Filing
25
ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 24 Objections to Report and Recommendation, filed by Joel Paul Reesman. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Joel Reesman, Prisoner ID: 316821)(TG)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8
JOEL PAUL REESMAN,
Petitioner,
9
v.
10
RON HAYNES,
11
CASE NO. C16-5925 BHS
ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
REMANDING
Respondent.
12
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
13
14
of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 23), and
15
Petitioner Joel Paul Ressman’s (“Reesman”) objections to the R&R (Dkt. 24).
On August 31, 2017, Judge Fricke issued the R&R recommending that the Court
16
17
dismiss the petition as time-barred. Dkt. 23. On September 11, 2017, Reesman filed
18
objections asserting numerous arguments, including that he is actually innocent. Dkt. 24
19
at 1–2.
20
21
The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s
disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or
22
ORDER - 1
1
modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the
2
magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
3
In this case, Reesman’s actual innocence claim has not been fully briefed or
4
considered. Although the Government identified the claim in its motion to dismiss, it did
5
not address the actual innocence exception to the statute of limitations. See Dkt. 15.
6
Reesman raised the argument in his response, Dkt. 22 at 4–7, and the Government did not
7
file a reply. Thus, Reesman has raised an exception to a time-barred petition, which has
8
not been responded to or otherwise considered. Therefore, the Court DECLINES to
9
adopt the R&R and REMANDS for further consideration.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated this 19th day of October, 2017.
A
12
13
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?