Van Buskirk v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Stipulated Motion to Remand; case is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
RAYLENE VAN BUSKIRK,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
Civil No. 3:16-CV-05979-RSM
13
ORDER
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will reconsider whether a
finding of disability on the existing record is warranted. If a favorable decision is not made on
the record, the Administrative Law Judge will re-evaluate the medical opinions and Plaintiff’s
allegations about her limitations, reassess whether Plaintiff meets or equals a Listing, and
reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. The ALJ will afford Plaintiff the opportunity to
appear at a new hearing and present evidence and testimony. Upon proper application, Plaintiff
shall be eligible for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et
seq.
Page 1
ORDER - [3:16-CV-05979-RSM]
1
DATED this 30 day of May 2017.
2
3
A
4
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
Presented by:
8
9
10
11
12
13
s/ David J. Burdett
DAVID J. BURDETT
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-2522
Fax: (206) 615-2531
david.burdett@ssa.gov
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [3:16-CV-05979-RSM]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?