Van Buskirk v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Stipulated Motion to Remand; case is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 RAYLENE VAN BUSKIRK, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 3:16-CV-05979-RSM 13 ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will reconsider whether a finding of disability on the existing record is warranted. If a favorable decision is not made on the record, the Administrative Law Judge will re-evaluate the medical opinions and Plaintiff’s allegations about her limitations, reassess whether Plaintiff meets or equals a Listing, and reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. The ALJ will afford Plaintiff the opportunity to appear at a new hearing and present evidence and testimony. Upon proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq. Page 1 ORDER - [3:16-CV-05979-RSM] 1 DATED this 30 day of May 2017. 2 3 A 4 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 Presented by: 8 9 10 11 12 13 s/ David J. Burdett DAVID J. BURDETT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2522 Fax: (206) 615-2531 david.burdett@ssa.gov 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER - [3:16-CV-05979-RSM]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?