Grenning v. Key

Filing 79

ORDER by Judge Robert J. Bryan on Petitioner's 78 Response to Respondent's Presumptive Motion to Strike Petitioners Objections to Report and Recommendation, construed as a motion to consider the objections, is denied as moot. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Neil Grenning, Prisoner ID: 872019)(GMR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10
11

NEIL GREENING,
Petitioner,

12
13

CASE NO. 16-5983 RJB DWC

v.
JAMES KEY,

14

Respondent.

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S
RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S
PRESUMPTIVE MOTION TO
STRIKE PETITIONER’S
OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

This matter comes before the Court on the Petitioner’s Response to Respondent’s
Presumptive Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Objections to Report and Recommendation. Dkt. 78.
The Court has considered this pleading, and the remaining record.
On August 8, 2018, after a full consideration of all Petitioner’s objections, the
undersigned adopted the Report and Recommendation, denied the petition, and closed the case.
Dkt. 76.
Petitioner filed the instant pleading that same day, on August 8, 2018, and moves the
Court to consider all his objections. Dkt. 78. Petitioner’s Response to Respondent’s

24
ORDER ON PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S PRESUMPTIVE MOTION TO STRIKE
PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1

1

Presumptive Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Objections to Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 78)

2

should be construed as a motion to consider the objections.

3

The Court specifically provided in the Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation

4

(Dkt. 76) that it considered all of Petitioner’s objections. Accordingly, Petitioner’s Response to

5

Respondent’s Presumptive Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Objections to Report and

6

Recommendation, construed as a motion to consider the objections, (Dkt. 78) should be denied

7

as moot.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and

10
11
12
13
14

to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.
Dated this 9th day of August, 2018.

A
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S PRESUMPTIVE MOTION TO STRIKE
PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2