Reed v. Department of Corrections et al
Filing
148
ORDER granting 143 Motion Modify Deadlines and Stay Proceedings while Pending Motions are Considered, signed by Judge David W. Christel. The deadline for Plaintiff's expert disclosures is extended to March 13, 2020. The deadline for Defendants' expert disclosures is extended to April 13, 2020. The Parties may now file dispositive motions on or before June 11, 2020. (GMR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
CHARLES V. REED,
Plaintiff,
11
13
G. STEVEN HAMMOND, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
ORDER
v.
12
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-5993-BHS-DWC
Plaintiff Charles V. Reed filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the
16 Court is Defendants’ Motion to Modify Deadlines and Stay Proceedings while Pending Motions
17 are Considered. Dkt. 143.
18
A. Request to Stay Proceedings
19
Defendants request the Court stay the proceedings until 60 days after the State medical
20 negligence issues raised by Defendants have been resolved. Dkt. 143. On January 13, 2020,
21 District Judge Settle adopted the undersigned’s Report and Recommendation regarding the State
22 law medical negligence issues and denied Defendants’ Motion to Certify State Law Question.
23 Dkt. 147. Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ request for a stay is denied as moot.
24
ORDER - 1
1
B. Modify Deadlines
2
Defendants also request the Court extend the following:
3
1. Deadline for Plaintiff’s expert disclosures to 60 days after the resolution of the state
law question;
4
5
6
2. Deadline for Defendants’ expert disclosures to 90 days after the resolution of the state
law question; and
3. Deadline to file and serve any dispositive motion to 150 days after the resolution of
the state law question.
7
Dkt. 143.
8
Pursuant to local rule, a motion for relief from a deadline should be filed before the
9
deadline lapses. LCR 7(j). The party requesting the extension must show good cause for the
10
extension. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), 6(b)(1). In addition, and extension “normally will be granted in
11
the absence of bad faith on the part of the party seeking relief or prejudice to the adverse party.”
12
California Trout v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 572 F.3d 1003, 1027 n.1 (9th Cir. 2009).
13
Here, Defendants request an extension of the expert disclosure and dispositive motions
14
deadline. Dkt. 143. Defendants state it would be appropriate to have an expert disclosure and
15
expert discovery period after the state law issues are resolved and prior to the dispositive motion
16
deadline. Dkt. 143. Plaintiff responded, stating he does not object to setting deadlines for expert
17
witness disclosures and expert discovery, but objects to extending the dispositive motion
18
deadline because the request is unnecessary and will only achieve delay. Dkt. 144. In their
19
Reply, Defendants argue they will have to file their dispositive motion and declarations without
20
knowing what Plaintiff’s expert’s testimony will be. Dkt. 145 at 2. Defendants argue changing
21
the dispositive motion deadline would not prejudice Plaintiff as he is already receiving the anti22
viral medication he sought. Dkt. 145 at 3.
23
24
ORDER - 2
1
The Court finds Defendants have shown good cause for an extension, and Plaintiff does
2 not argue Defendants are acting in bad faith or that an extension would prejudice him. Moreover,
3 because it appears Defendants were awaiting the Court’s decision on their objections to the
4 undersigned’s Report and Recommendation and Motion to Certify State Law Question, which
5 was only recently resolved, the Court will extend the expert disclosure and dispositive deadline
6 in order to provide new deadlines which both sides can comply with. Therefore, Defendants’
7 Motion (Dkt. 143) is granted. It is ORDERED:
8
1. The deadline for Plaintiff’s expert disclosures is extended to March 13, 2020. The
deadline for Defendants’ expert disclosures is extended to April 13, 2020.
9
2. The Parties may now file dispositive motions on or before June 11, 2020.
10
Dated this 15th day of January, 2020.
11
12
A
13
David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?