Basra v. Morgan et al
Filing
83
ORDER denying 79 Motion to Appoint Counsel; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Paramjit Basra, Prisoner ID: 357517)(DN)
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
9
PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA,
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
CASE NO. C16-6005 RBL
ORDER
RICHARD MORGAN, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Basra’s Motion for appointment of
15
counsel. [Dkt. # 79]. Basra claims that because the court denied (in part) summary judgment
16
[Dkt. # 49], his claims must have merit. He also claims he cannot articulate his claims, which is
17
demonstrably untrue.
18
No constitutional right to counsel exists for an indigent plaintiff in a civil case unless the
19
plaintiff may lose his physical liberty if he loses the litigation. See Lassiter v. Dept. of Social
20
Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court has the
21
discretion to appoint counsel for indigent litigants who are proceeding IFP. United States v.
22
$292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, 54 F.3d 564, 569 (9th Cir. 1995).
23
24
ORDER - 1
1
The Court will appoint counsel only under “exceptional circumstances.” Id.; Wilborn v.
2
Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). “A finding of exceptional circumstances
3
requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the
4
plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.”
5
Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331 (internal quotations omitted). These factors must be viewed together
6
before reaching a decision on whether to appoint counsel under § 1915(e)(1). Id.
7
Basra has not demonstrated either of the required elements for appointment of counsel.
8
The Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated this 25th day of September, 2018.
11
12
A
13
Ronald B. Leighton
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?