Basra v. Morgan et al

Filing 83

ORDER denying 79 Motion to Appoint Counsel; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Paramjit Basra, Prisoner ID: 357517)(DN)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA, Plaintiff, 10 11 v. CASE NO. C16-6005 RBL ORDER RICHARD MORGAN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Basra’s Motion for appointment of 15 counsel. [Dkt. # 79]. Basra claims that because the court denied (in part) summary judgment 16 [Dkt. # 49], his claims must have merit. He also claims he cannot articulate his claims, which is 17 demonstrably untrue. 18 No constitutional right to counsel exists for an indigent plaintiff in a civil case unless the 19 plaintiff may lose his physical liberty if he loses the litigation. See Lassiter v. Dept. of Social 20 Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court has the 21 discretion to appoint counsel for indigent litigants who are proceeding IFP. United States v. 22 $292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, 54 F.3d 564, 569 (9th Cir. 1995). 23 24 ORDER - 1 1 The Court will appoint counsel only under “exceptional circumstances.” Id.; Wilborn v. 2 Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). “A finding of exceptional circumstances 3 requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the 4 plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” 5 Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331 (internal quotations omitted). These factors must be viewed together 6 before reaching a decision on whether to appoint counsel under § 1915(e)(1). Id. 7 Basra has not demonstrated either of the required elements for appointment of counsel. 8 The Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated this 25th day of September, 2018. 11 12 A 13 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?