Cowles v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Stipulated Motion to Remand. This Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 MARCUS W. COWLES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 3:16-CV-06056-RSM 13 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in regard to Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income payments under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings including a new hearing and a new decision. The Administrative Law Judge will give Plaintiff an opportunity to submit additional evidence; reevaluate the medical opinion evidence; reconsider Plaintiff’s alleged symptoms; reconsider Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; and continue with the sequential evaluation obtaining supplemental vocational expert evidence, as necessary. 23 24 Page 1 ORDER - [3:16-CV-06056-RSM] 1 2 3 This Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). 4 5 DATED this 20 day of June 2017. 6 A 7 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Presented by: s/ Nancy A. Mishalanie NANCY A. MISHALANIE Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-3619 Fax: (206) 615-2531 nancy.mishalanie@ssa.gov 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER - [3:16-CV-06056-RSM]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?