Cowles v. Colvin

Filing 26

AGREED ORDER re EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES re parties' 24 Stipulated Motion, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 MARCUS COWLES, Plaintiff, 9 10 vs. 11 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 12 13 Defendant. ) ) CIVIL NO. C16-6056-RSM ) ) AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES AND ) EXPENSES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 15 Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 16 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and Plaintiff’s EAJA petition, it is hereby ORDERED that EAJA 17 attorney’s fees of $4,316.03 and expenses in the amount of $20.04 are awarded to 18 Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 U.S. 2521 (2010). If it is determined that 19 Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the 20 21 22 23 24 Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to JEANETTE LAFFOON, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, JEANETTE LAFFOON, at 410-A South Capitol Way, Olympia, WA 98501. 25 AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES [C16-6056-RSM] - Page 1 MADDOX & LAFFOON, P.S. 410-A South Capitol Way Olympia, WA. 98501 (360) 786-8276 1 DATED: July 18, 2017 2 A 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 Presented by: /s/ JEANETTE LAFFOON JEANETTE LAFFOON, WSBA #30872 Attorney for Plaintiff 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Approved for entry, Notice of presentation waived: /s/ NANCY A. MISHALANIE NANCY A. MISHALANIE Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant (signed per email authorization) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES [C16-6056-RSM] - Page 2 MADDOX & LAFFOON, P.S. 410-A South Capitol Way Olympia, WA. 98501 (360) 786-8276

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?