Roise v. Berryhill

Filing 29

ORDER granting 27 Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees under the EAJA signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 7 8 9 MICHAEL RICHARD ROISE, Case No. 3:17-CV-05074- RSM 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 ORDER FOR EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the total amount of $7,838.00 and expenses in the amount of $20.04 (for postage) be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010); and $5.00 in costs (for photocopies) shall be awarded pursuant to 28 USC 1920. If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees and the check for expenses shall be made payable to 24 25 ORDER FOR EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES 3:17-CV – 05074-RSM Law Office of Nancy J.Meserow 7540 S.W. 51st Ave. Portland,OR 97219 (503) 560-6788 1 Plaintiff’s attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to 2 Plaintiff’s attorney; and mailed to her office: 3 5 Law Office of Nancy J.Meserow 7540 S.W. 51st Ave. Portland, OR 97219 6 Whether the check is made payable to Plaintiff, or to her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, the 4 7 check shall be mailed to Attorney Meserow at the address as indicated supra. 8 Dated this 10 day of October 2017. 9 10 11 12 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER FOR EAJA FEES AND EXPENSES 3:17-CV – 05074-RSM Law Office of Nancy J.Meserow 7540 S.W. 51st Ave. Portland,OR 97219 (503) 560-6788

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?