McClane v. City of Walla Walla et al

Filing 8

ORDER that this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Stephen McClane, Prisoner ID: 890073)(CMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 Stephen Paul McClane, 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE v. 12 CASE NO. C17-5116 RBL-DWC City of Walla Walla et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ` Plaintiff Stephen Paul McClane, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Plaintiff is housed at Washington State Penitentiary (“WSP”) located in Walla Walla, Washington, and his claims arise out of actions committed at WSP, the Court orders this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington.1 21 22 23 24 1 Because an order transferring venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) does not address the merits of the case, it is a nondispositive matter that is within the province of a magistrate judge's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). See Pavao v. Unifund CCR Partners, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1238, 1241 (S.D. Cal. 2013); Corrinet v. Burke, 2012 WL 1952658, at *6 (D.Or. Apr. 30, 2012); Shenker v. Murasky, 1996 WL 650974, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 6, 1996) (“An order issued by a magistrate judge transferring venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) is non-dispositive.”); Holmes v. TV–3, Inc., 141 F.R.D. 697, 697 (W.D. La. 1991) (“Since [a motion to transfer venue] is not one of the ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - 1 1 2 BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated at Washington State Penitentiary (“WSP”) alleges 3 Defendants violated his constitutional rights when they failed to properly prosecute and 4 adjudicate a case he filed regarding staff assault at the Clallam Bay Corrections Center 5 (“CBCC”). Dkt. 6 at 3. 6 Plaintiff alleges Defendant Donaldson, the Walla Walla City Attorney, “failed to bring 7 charges [against] me.” Id. at 4. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Donaldson should have charged him 8 based on a May, 22, 2015 infraction. Id. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Martin, the Walla Walla 9 County Superior Court Clerk, would not allow Plaintiff to retain a public defender for his staff 10 assault case at CBCC. Id. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Lohrman, a Walla Walla Superior Court 11 Judge, refused to help Plaintiff determine if he has a disability and seek other relief. Id. Plaintiff 12 requests “due process in my staff assault at [CBCC].” Dkt. 6 at 4. Plaintiff does not seek 13 monetary damages. Id. 14 The Court has not ordered the Clerk’s Office to attempt service of process. Defendant has 15 not appeared in this action. See Dkt. On March 7, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause 16 why his case should not be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. Dkt. 7. The Court 17 warned Plaintiff failure to file a response to the Court’s order would result in Plaintiff’s case 18 being transferred to the Eastern District. Dkt. 7. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Court’s 19 Order. See Dkt. 20 21 22 23 motions excepted in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), nor is it dispositive of any claim on the merits within the meaning of Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this ruling is issued under the authority thereof, and in accordance 24 with the standing order of this Court.”). ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - 2 1 2 DISCUSSION Venue may be raised by the court sua sponte where the defendant has not filed a 3 responsive pleading and the time for doing so has not run. See Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 4 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). When jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity, venue is proper in (1) 5 the district in which any defendant resides, if all of the defendants reside in the same state; (2) 6 the district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim 7 occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) a 8 judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action 9 may otherwise be brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). When venue is improper, the district court 10 has the discretion to either dismiss the case or transfer it “in the interest of justice.” See 28 11 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 12 Here, it is clear Defendants all reside in Walla Walla, Washington and Plaintiff’s claims 13 arise out of actions committed at WSP in Walla Walla, Washington, which is within the venue of 14 the Eastern District of Washington. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 128(a).2 Accordingly, the Court orders this 15 case be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. 16 The Clerks’ Office is directed to electronically transfer this case to the Eastern District of 17 Washington fifteen days after the date of this Order. 18 Dated this 5th day of May, 2017. 20 A 21 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 19 22 2 The only allegation related to the Western District of Washington is Plaintiff’s request for “due process” 23 related to his staff assault case at CBCC. Dkt. 6 at 4. However, it does not appear Plaintiff is challenging any conditions of confinement at CBCC, but instead, Plaintiff is challenging Defendants’ failure to provide him with 24 assistance in litigating his claims arising out of staff conduct at CBCC. Id. at 3-4. ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?