Hammou v. USCIS
ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
CASE NO. C17-5260JLR
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
On September 21, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff Sanaa Hammou to show cause
why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve Defendant with a summons
and copy of the complaint within the timeframe provided in Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m). (OSC (Dkt. # 9).) The court ordered Plaintiff to respond within ten
days and warned Plaintiff that a failure to demonstrate good cause for the failure to
comply with Rule 4(m) would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id. at
2.) More than ten days have passed since the court issued its order, and Plaintiff has
failed to respond. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s
ORDER - 1
complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with Rule 4(m).
Dated this 4th day of October, 2017.
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?