Hammou v. USCIS

Filing 10

ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

SANAA HAMMOU,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

CASE NO. C17-5260JLR
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WTIHOUT PREJUDICE

12
13

USCIS,
Defendant.

14
15

On September 21, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff Sanaa Hammou to show cause

16

why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve Defendant with a summons

17

and copy of the complaint within the timeframe provided in Federal Rule of Civil

18

Procedure 4(m). (OSC (Dkt. # 9).) The court ordered Plaintiff to respond within ten

19

days and warned Plaintiff that a failure to demonstrate good cause for the failure to

20

comply with Rule 4(m) would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id. at

21

2.) More than ten days have passed since the court issued its order, and Plaintiff has

22

failed to respond. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s

ORDER - 1

1

complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to

2

comply with Rule 4(m).

3

Dated this 4th day of October, 2017.

4
5

A

6

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2