Gavins v. Berryhill
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL directing Plaintiff to show cause by 9/7/2017 why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
BRUCE EDWARD GAVINS,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
CASE NO. C17-5299JLR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
REGARDING DISMISSAL
12
13
14
15
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant.
On April 11, 2017, Plaintiff Bruce Edward Gavins’s case for review of Defendant
16
Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill’s final decision denying Social Security benefits was
17
transferred from the District of Oregon to the Western District of Washington. (Order
18
(Dkt. # 13).) The Clerk issued a letter on April 21, 2017, informing Mr. Gavins’s
19
attorney of the need to file a pro hac vice application. (Letter (Dkt. # 15).) The
20
Commissioner filed an answer in this court on May 5, 2017. (Answer (Dkt. # 16).) On
21
May 8, 2017, the court issued a scheduling order requiring Mr. Gavins to file an opening
22
brief by June 5, 2017. (Sched. Order (Dkt. # 18).) Mr. Gavins’s attorney filed a pro hac
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1
1
vice application on August 11, 2017 (see Dkt. # 19), but Mr. Gavins has failed to file an
2
opening brief. The court ORDERS Mr. Gavins to show cause no later than September 7,
3
2017, why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to show
4
cause will result in dismissal of this action.
5
DATED this 29th day of August, 2017.
7
A
8
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?