Jackson v. Berryhill

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Motion for EAJA Attorney Fees signed by Judge David W. Christel.(SH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

8
9
10

BRIAN A. JACKSON,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER ON STIPULATED
MOTION FOR EAJA FEES

v.
NANCY A BERRYHILL, Deputy
Commissioner of Social Security for
Operations,
Defendant.

15
16

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05312-DWC

This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local
Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13. See also Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate
Judge, Dkt. 6. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees
Pursuant to EAJA.” Dkt. 26.
Based on the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (“EAJA”), Plaintiff’s
motion (Dkt. 26), and the relevant record, the Court orders EAJA attorney’s fees of $6,986.04
(“EAJA Award”) be awarded to Plaintiff. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591–97 (2010).

23
24
ORDER ON STIPULATED MOTION FOR EAJA
FEES - 1

1

The Acting Commissioner shall contact the Department of Treasury after this Order is

2 entered to determine if the EAJA Award is subject to any offset. If the U.S. Department of the
3 Treasury verifies to the Office of General Counsel that Plaintiff does not owe a debt, the
4 government will honor Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA Award and pay the EAJA Award directly
5 to Tha Win, Plaintiff’s counsel. If there is an offset, any remainder shall be made payable to
6 Plaintiff, based on the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program and standard practices, and
7 the check shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Tha Win, 606 Maynard Avenue South, Suite
8 201, Seattle, Washington 98104.
9

Dated this 12th day of June, 2018.

A

10
11

David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON STIPULATED MOTION FOR EAJA
FEES - 2