Griffin v. Herzog et al
Filing
80
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 77 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Robert Dean Griffin, 78 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Robert Dean Griffin; Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Robert Griffin, Prisoner ID: 851075)(DN)
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
ROBERT DEAN GRIFFIN,
CASE NO. C17-5394RBL
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
AND DENYING OBJECTION
ROBERT HERZOG,
Defendant.
13
14
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Fricke’s Report and
15
Recommendation [Dkt. #76] regarding Plaintiff Griffin’s failure to comply with her order to file
16
an amended complaint addressing various deficiencies. The Court has reviewed Griffin’s
17
Objections [Dkt. #77] to the Report and Recommendation.
18
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
19
2. Griffin’s requests for injunctive relief are DENIED;
20
3. Griffin’s complaint(s) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
21
4. The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Petitioner, defendant’s counsel, and to United
22
States Magistrate Judge Fricke.
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
The Court has also reviewed Griffin’s Objection [Dkt. #78] to Judge Fricke’s Order [Dkt.
2
#75] denying his Motion [Dkt. #67] for appointment of counsel. A district judge shall “consider
3
timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is
4
contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(a).
5
6
In light of the dismissal of this case, this is a standard that Griffin cannot meet. The
Magistrate Judge’s Order denying appointment of counsel is AFFIRMED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated this 9th day of November, 2017.
10
A
11
Ronald B. Leighton
United States District Judge
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?