Phillips v. Berryhill
Filing
28
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS re 27 Motion to Remand signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (KMP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
7
8
9
RANDY PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
Case No. C17-5421-JPD
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING
FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEEDINGS
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff brought this action to seek judicial review of the denial of his application for
16
disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Dkt. 4. The
17
parties have stipulated that this case should be reversed and remanded for further administrative
18
proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. 27.
19
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that this case be REVERSED
20
and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings before an Administrative Law Judge
21
(“ALJ”). On remand, the ALJ shall:
22
1)
further consider the medical opinions of Clark Ashworth, Ph.D., Peter Weiss,
Ph.D., and Phyllis Sanchez, Ph.D.;
23
24
ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
2)
reevaluate whether the claimant’s mental limitations meet or equal a listing,
2
consulting a medical expert if necessary, and, if they do not, reassess Plaintiff’s
3
residual functional capacity; and
4
3)
supplemental vocational expert testimony.
5
6
as needed to reevaluate steps 4 and 5 of the sequential evaluation process, obtain
The ALJ shall also offer plaintiff an opportunity for a de novo hearing, and shall issue a
7
new decision. Plaintiff may also present new arguments and further medical evidence, if such
8
evidence becomes available.
9
DATED this 12th day of February, 2018.
A
10
11
JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?