Monroe v. Berryhill

Filing 21

ORDER granting parties' 19 Stipulated Motion for EAJA fee signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TH)

Download PDF
U.S. District Court Judge Robert S. Lasnik 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 GUY E. MONROE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 ) ) CIVIL NO. C17-5444-RSL ) ) AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and Plaintiff’s EAJA petition, it is hereby ORDERED that EAJA 17 attorney’s fees of $3,840.62 are awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 U.S. 18 19 20 2521 (2010). If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA 21 fees shall be made payable to JEANETTE LAFFOON, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment 22 of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to 23 Plaintiff’s counsel, JEANETTE LAFFOON, at 410-A South Capitol Way, Olympia, WA 24 98501. 25 AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES [C17-5444-RSL] - Page 1 MADDOX & LAFFOON, P.S. 410-A South Capitol Way Olympia, WA. 98501 (360) 786-8276 1 Dated this 20th day of December, 2017. 2 A 3 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 4 5 6 Presented by: 7 8 9 /s/ JEANETTE LAFFOON JEANETTE LAFFOON, WSBA #30872 Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 Approved for entry, Notice of presentation waived: 12 13 14 15 /s/ BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant (signed per email authorization) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AGREED ORDER RE EAJA FEES [C17-5444-RSL] - Page 2 MADDOX & LAFFOON, P.S. 410-A South Capitol Way Olympia, WA. 98501 (360) 786-8276

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?