LePine v. PetSmart, Inc

Filing 39

ORDER granting 35 final approval of class action settlement, and 30 Motion for Attorney Fees. **SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS** Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(CMG)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 10 11 12 13 DEBORAH LEPINE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 PETSMART, INC, a Delaware Corporation, 18 19 Case No.: 3:17-cv-05488-BHS ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: October 10, 2018 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS HAMMONDLAW, P.C. 1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410 BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766 1 The Court, having read and considered all of the papers of the parties and their counsel, 2 including Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval and supporting pleadings filed on October 3, 3 2018 and Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of Class Counsel’s Fees and Costs, and Enhancement 4 5 6 Award for Class Representative, filed on September 26, 2018; having granted preliminary approval on July 26, 2018 (“Preliminary Approval Order”); having previously directed that 7 notice be given to all Class Members of preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement and 8 the final approval hearing, and the right to be excluded from or object to the settlement, and 9 having received no objections or opposition to the settlement; and good cause appearing, 10 pursuant to Rule 23(e)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), 11 12 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Court hereby makes final the conditional class certification contained in the 14 Preliminary Approval Order, and thus makes final for purposes of the Settlement Agreement the 15 certification, pursuant to FRCP 23(g)(1)(A), of a class whose members consist of: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 all current and former PetSmart employees paid “Groom Pay” for work performed in Washington State during at least one pay period between June 26, 2014 and the July 26, 2018. 2. The Court hereby finds that the Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement, as mailed to all Class Members, as previously ordered by the Court, fairly and adequately described the terms of the proposed Settlement Agreement, the manner in which Class Members could object to the settlement, and the manner in which Class Members could opt out of the Class; was the best notice practicable under the circumstances; was valid, due and sufficient notice to all 25 Class Members; and complied fully with FRCP Rule 23(e)(1)(B), due process, and all other 26 applicable laws. The court further finds that a full and fair opportunity has been afforded to Class 27 28 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS HAMMONDLAW, P.C. 1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410 BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766 1 Members to participate in the proceedings convened to determine whether the proposed 2 Settlement Agreement should be given final approval. Accordingly, the Court hereby determines 3 that all Class Members who did not timely and properly request to be excluded from the 4 5 6 7 settlement are bound by this final Order and shall be deemed to have released any claims described in the Settlement Agreement (the “Released Claims”). 3. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate 8 as to the Class, Plaintiff and Defendant, and is the product of good faith, arm’s-length 9 negotiations between the parties, and further, that the Settlement Agreement is consistent with 10 public policy, and fully complies with all applicable provisions of law. Accordingly, the Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 hereby finally and unconditionally approves the Settlement Agreement pursuant to FRCP 23(e)(1), and specifically: a. Approves the Settlement Amount of $700,000 as specified in and subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; b. Approves the distribution of the Net Class Fund to Participating Class Members in the manner specified in and subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; c. Approves the application for Class Representative Award of $5,000 to Plaintiff/Class Representative Deborah LePine to be paid from the Settlement Amount, subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; d. Approves Class Counsel’s requested fees award of $210,000 which is thirty percent (30%) of, and to be paid from, the Settlement Amount subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS HAMMONDLAW, P.C. 1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410 BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766 e. 1 Approves Class Counsel’s request for reimbursement of litigation 2 expenses of $7,468.36 to be paid from the Settlement Amount, subject to the terms of the 3 Settlement Agreement; 4 5 6 f. Approves payment to Simpluris, Inc., the Settlement Administrator, of Settlement Administration Costs as incurred, in the amount of costs and fees actually incurred 7 and documented to the parties’ satisfaction, not to exceed $7,300 to be paid from the 8 Settlement Amount, subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; and 9 10 g. Approves and orders that in all other particulars the Settlement Agreement be carried out by the Parties and the Settlement Administrator subject to the terms 11 12 13 thereof. 4. The Court orders that, following the Settlement Effective Date as defined in the 14 Settlement Agreement, the Parties and the Settlement Administrator shall carry out the 15 following implementation schedule for further actions and proceedings: 16 17 Within 14 calendar days of Settlement Effective Date Deadline for Defendant to transfer Settlement Fund to the Settlement Administrator 18 19 Within 21 calendar days of Settlement Effective Date 20 21 22 23 Within 30 calendar days of Settlement Effective Date 24 25 90 days after checks are mailed 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS Deadline for Settlement Administrator to pay Attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel; and Class Representative Award as specified above to the Plaintiff/Class Representative; Settlement payments to all participating Settlement Class Members, by checks sent via first class mail. Deadline for Settlement Administrator to issue Settlement payments to participating Settlement Class Members Uncashed check are voided and funds shall be transmitted by the Settlement Administrator the Washington State Department of Revenue Unclaimed Property Fund in the name of the Settlement Class Members HAMMONDLAW, P.C. 1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410 BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766 1 5. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that without 2 affecting the finality of this Order, the Court retains exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over 3 the case for purposes of supervising, implementing, interpreting and enforcing this Order and 4 5 6 7 the Settlement Agreement, as may become necessary, until all of the terms of the Settlement Agreement have been fully carried out. 6. Upon the Settlement Effective Date, Plaintiff and all Class Members who have 8 not timely and properly excluded themselves from the Settlement Agreement shall be and hereby 9 are enjoined from filing, initiating or continuing to prosecute any actions, claims, complaints, or 10 proceedings with respect to the Released Claims. 11 12 Presented by: 13 14 15 /s/ Julian Hammond Dated this 3rd day of October 2018. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 18 DATED this 10th day of October, 2018. 19 A 20 21 22 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS HAMMONDLAW, P.C. 1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410 BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?