LePine v. PetSmart, Inc
Filing
39
ORDER granting 35 final approval of class action settlement, and 30 Motion for Attorney Fees. **SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS** Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(CMG)
1
HONORABLE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
10
11
12
13
DEBORAH LEPINE, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
vs.
17
PETSMART, INC, a Delaware Corporation,
18
19
Case No.: 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
October 10, 2018
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
HAMMONDLAW, P.C.
1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410
BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766
1
The Court, having read and considered all of the papers of the parties and their counsel,
2
including Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval and supporting pleadings filed on October 3,
3
2018 and Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of Class Counsel’s Fees and Costs, and Enhancement
4
5
6
Award for Class Representative, filed on September 26, 2018; having granted preliminary
approval on July 26, 2018 (“Preliminary Approval Order”); having previously directed that
7
notice be given to all Class Members of preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement and
8
the final approval hearing, and the right to be excluded from or object to the settlement, and
9
having received no objections or opposition to the settlement; and good cause appearing,
10
pursuant to Rule 23(e)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”),
11
12
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
The Court hereby makes final the conditional class certification contained in the
14
Preliminary Approval Order, and thus makes final for purposes of the Settlement Agreement the
15
certification, pursuant to FRCP 23(g)(1)(A), of a class whose members consist of:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
all current and former PetSmart employees paid “Groom Pay” for work performed in
Washington State during at least one pay period between June 26, 2014 and the July 26,
2018.
2.
The Court hereby finds that the Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement, as
mailed to all Class Members, as previously ordered by the Court, fairly and adequately described
the terms of the proposed Settlement Agreement, the manner in which Class Members could
object to the settlement, and the manner in which Class Members could opt out of the Class; was
the best notice practicable under the circumstances; was valid, due and sufficient notice to all
25
Class Members; and complied fully with FRCP Rule 23(e)(1)(B), due process, and all other
26
applicable laws. The court further finds that a full and fair opportunity has been afforded to Class
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
HAMMONDLAW, P.C.
1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410
BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766
1
Members to participate in the proceedings convened to determine whether the proposed
2
Settlement Agreement should be given final approval. Accordingly, the Court hereby determines
3
that all Class Members who did not timely and properly request to be excluded from the
4
5
6
7
settlement are bound by this final Order and shall be deemed to have released any claims
described in the Settlement Agreement (the “Released Claims”).
3.
The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate
8
as to the Class, Plaintiff and Defendant, and is the product of good faith, arm’s-length
9
negotiations between the parties, and further, that the Settlement Agreement is consistent with
10
public policy, and fully complies with all applicable provisions of law. Accordingly, the Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
hereby finally and unconditionally approves the Settlement Agreement pursuant to FRCP
23(e)(1), and specifically:
a.
Approves the Settlement Amount of $700,000 as specified in and
subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement;
b.
Approves the distribution of the Net Class Fund to Participating Class
Members in the manner specified in and subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement;
c.
Approves the application for Class Representative Award of $5,000 to
Plaintiff/Class Representative Deborah LePine to be paid from the Settlement Amount, subject
to the terms of the Settlement Agreement;
d.
Approves Class Counsel’s requested fees award of $210,000 which is
thirty percent (30%) of, and to be paid from, the Settlement Amount subject to the terms of the
Settlement Agreement;
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
HAMMONDLAW, P.C.
1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410
BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766
e.
1
Approves Class Counsel’s request for reimbursement of litigation
2
expenses of $7,468.36 to be paid from the Settlement Amount, subject to the terms of the
3
Settlement Agreement;
4
5
6
f.
Approves payment to Simpluris, Inc., the Settlement Administrator, of
Settlement Administration Costs as incurred, in the amount of costs and fees actually incurred
7
and documented to the parties’ satisfaction, not to exceed $7,300 to be paid from the
8
Settlement Amount, subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; and
9
10
g.
Approves and orders that in all other particulars the Settlement
Agreement be carried out by the Parties and the Settlement Administrator subject to the terms
11
12
13
thereof.
4.
The Court orders that, following the Settlement Effective Date as defined in the
14
Settlement Agreement, the Parties and the Settlement Administrator shall carry out the
15
following implementation schedule for further actions and proceedings:
16
17
Within 14 calendar days of Settlement
Effective Date
Deadline for Defendant to transfer Settlement
Fund to the Settlement Administrator
18
19
Within 21 calendar days of Settlement
Effective Date
20
21
22
23
Within 30 calendar days of Settlement
Effective Date
24
25
90 days after checks are mailed
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
Deadline for Settlement Administrator to pay
Attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel; and
Class Representative Award as specified above to
the Plaintiff/Class Representative;
Settlement payments to all participating Settlement
Class Members, by checks sent via first class mail.
Deadline for Settlement Administrator to issue
Settlement payments to participating Settlement
Class Members
Uncashed check are voided and funds shall be
transmitted by the Settlement Administrator the
Washington State Department of Revenue
Unclaimed Property Fund in the name of the
Settlement Class Members
HAMMONDLAW, P.C.
1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410
BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766
1
5.
This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that without
2
affecting the finality of this Order, the Court retains exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over
3
the case for purposes of supervising, implementing, interpreting and enforcing this Order and
4
5
6
7
the Settlement Agreement, as may become necessary, until all of the terms of the Settlement
Agreement have been fully carried out.
6.
Upon the Settlement Effective Date, Plaintiff and all Class Members who have
8
not timely and properly excluded themselves from the Settlement Agreement shall be and hereby
9
are enjoined from filing, initiating or continuing to prosecute any actions, claims, complaints, or
10
proceedings with respect to the Released Claims.
11
12
Presented by:
13
14
15
/s/
Julian Hammond
Dated this 3rd day of October 2018.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
18
DATED this 10th day of October, 2018.
19
A
20
21
22
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05488-BHS
HAMMONDLAW, P.C.
1829 REISTERSTOWN RD., SUITE 410
BALTIMORE, MD 21208; Tel: 310-601-6766
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?