Port of Vancouver, USA v. Pacific Coast Shredding, L.L.C.

Filing 156

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 1/11/2021 before Judge David W. Christel, via Zoom. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (LH)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-05571-RSL Document 156 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 PORT OF VANCOUVER, USA 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE V. 13 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5571-RSL PACIFIC COAST SHREDDING LLC 14 Defendants. 15 This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel to 16 17 conduct a Settlement Conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Settlement 18 Conference is set to take place on January 11, 2021 before United States Magistrate Judge David 19 W. Christel, via Zoom. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 21 1. Each party and their counsel shall come to the Settlement Conference prepared 22 with a reasonable plan to resolve and fully settle and are expected to participate in the Settlement 23 Conference with a mindset, attitude and creative approach of being problem solvers. 24 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -1 Case 3:17-cv-05571-RSL Document 156 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 5 1 2. 2 3 4 Counsel for each party (and the party if so desired) shall separately confer with the undersigned by telephone prior to the Settlement Conference and be prepared to discuss the items set forth on Attachment “A,” including: A. a candid summation of its assessment of the strengths of its case and the strengths of the opposing party’s case, B. a review of the facts, provable damages, assessment of its probability or prevailing on any disputed facts and on any rulings of law, and a brief discussion of any legal authority which the party contends would enhance its position at trial, 8 C. the specific reasons why the case should settle, and 9 D. a history of any past negotiations. 10 3. All parties shall be personally present at the Settlement Conference and must be 5 6 7 11 represented by lead or chief counsel authorized to participate in settlement negotiations. In the 12 case of businesses, corporations, governmental entities, etc., a representative for every party with 13 full settlement authority must be personally present at the Settlement Conference. If any of the 14 parties are appearing or defending the action under an insurance agreement, an insurance 15 company/risk pool representative fully authorized to settle the case must be personally present at 16 the Settlement Conference. In sum, all parties in this matter necessary to conduct an effective 17 Settlement Conference shall be personally represented by someone in attendance at the 18 Settlement Conference with full settlement authority. 19 4. All information provided to and communications with the settlement judge shall 20 be held in confidence unless the party providing it authorizes its disclosure. All written material 21 submitted will be returned to the submitting party or shredded upon termination of the settlement 22 proceedings. 23 24 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -2 Case 3:17-cv-05571-RSL Document 156 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 5 1 5. 2 3 4 settlement procedure shall be held in confidence and may not be used in any way against any party to this litigation. 6. 5 6 All oral statements, written documents, or other materials considered during the None of the matters or information discussed during the conference will be communicated to the trial judge. Dated this 14th day of December, 2020. 7 8 A 9 10 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -3 Case 3:17-cv-05571-RSL Document 156 Filed 12/14/20 Page 4 of 5 1 ATTACHMENT “A” Settlement Conference QUESTIONNAIRE 2 3 1. Statement of facts pertinent to settlement. 4 5 2. Plaintiff(s)’ theories of recovery (if not obvious). 6 7 3. If liability not admitted, bona fide defenses and counterclaims tendered by Defendant(s). 8 9 4. Damages - Plaintiff(s) should list the specials incurred and claimed. Do not use the 10 maximum possible figures but what is deemed reasonable and what will be presented at 11 trial. List any special and general damages separately. Defendant(s) should list what is 12 claimed to be a reasonable amount where items are contested. 13 14 5. Summarize the bona fide disputes regarding damages. 15 16 6. Weaknesses. 17 18 7. Plaintiff(s)’ evaluation of fair settlement. $________________. 19 20 8. Defendant(s)’ evaluation of fair settlement. $______________. 21 22 23 24 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -4 Case 3:17-cv-05571-RSL Document 156 Filed 12/14/20 Page 5 of 5 1 9. If Plaintiff(s) recover a judgment, is the question of apportionment of and liability among 2 Defendant(s) a factor affecting negotiations? 3 4 10. Are there viable sources from whom Defendant(s) may seek contribution? 5 6 11. Do you feel the other party has negotiated in good faith? 7 8 12. Does either party know of any other factors which may impact these negotiations? 9 10 13. Do client and attorney agree on the settlement value? 11 12 14. Are there any factors not readily apparent which could hamper settlement negotiations? 13 14 15. State your opinion as to the bona fide chance for settlement in this matter. 15 16 16. Are there legal questions which effectively bar serious settlement negotiations? 17 18 Expenses of litigation: 19 To date: $__________ Estimate of present to conclusion: $__________ 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?