Follis v. Baker et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 21 Plaintiff's Appeal of the Decision and Review; the Report and Recommendations Order has not been adopted; plaintiff is to file his objection immediately; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.**1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Charles Follis, Prisoner ID: 900149)(DN)

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8

CHARLES EDWARD FOLLIS,

CASE NO. C17-5644RBL

9
Plaintiff,
10

v.

11

ORDER

BAKER,

12

Defendant.

13
14

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Follis’s “Appeal of the Decision and

15

Review” [Dkt. #21] The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #19]

16

regarding the dismissal of some of Follis’s claims. This Court has not yet adopted that R &R,
and Follis has sought and obtained additional time to object to it [Dkt. #s 20 & 22]. Indeed, that

17
18
19

time has now expired and Follis has not yet filed an objection.
But there is nothing to “appeal,” yet, and certainly not to this Court. The Motion is
DENIED. Follis should file any objection to the R &R immediately.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
Dated this 13th day of February, 2018.
21

A

22
23

Ronald B. Leighton
United States District Judge

24

ORDER - 1