Gatti v. Berryhill

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting plaintiff's 14 Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 VICTORIA LOUISE GATTI, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05745-RSL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner of Social Security for Operations, 12 Defendant. 13 14 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge David W. 15 Christel, United States Magistrate Judge, and the relevant record, does hereby find and ORDER: 16 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 17 (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED in the amount of attorney’s 18 fees of $ 3,528.14 and costs of $ 400.00, pursuant to EAJA and consistent with 19 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591–97 (2010). 20 (3) Plaintiff’s award is subject to any offset allowed pursuant to the Department of 21 Treasury’s Offset Program. See Ratliff, 560 U.S. at 595-98. If the U.S. 22 Department of the Treasury verifies to the Office of General Counsel that Plaintiff 23 does not owe a debt and is not subject to any offset, the government shall pay the 24 EAJA Award directly to Kevin Kerr, Plaintiff’s counsel. If there is an offset, the ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 any remainder shall be made payable to Plaintiff, based on the Department of the 2 Treasury’s Offset Program and standard practices, and the check be mailed to 3 Plaintiff’s counsel, Kevin Kerr, at P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. 4 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record. 5 6 Dated this 21st day of August, 2018. 7 A Robert S. Lasnik 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?