HP Tuners, LLC v. Sykes-Bonnett et al

Filing 187

ORDER AWARDING SANCTIONS re 158 Motion signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. HPT is awarded sanctions in the amount of $7,735, which is 22.1 hours of work at $350 per hour. (GMR)

Case 3:17-cv-05760-BHS Document 187 Filed 08/26/19 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

6
7
8

CASE NO. C17-5760 BHS

HP TUNERS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

9

ORDER AWARDING SANCTIONS

v.

10

KEVIN SYKES-BONNETT, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13
14
15

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff HP Tuners, LLC’s (“HPT”)
petition for attorney’s fees. Dkt. 158.
On March 14, 2019, the Court granted HPT’s motion for sanctions and granted

16

HPT leave to file a petition for fees. Dkt. 155. On March 29, 2019, HPT filed the instant

17

petition requesting $20,125. Dkt. 158. On April 12, 2019, Defendants John Martinson,

18

Syked ECU Tuning Incorporated, and Kevin Sykes-Bonnett (“Defendants”) responded

19

contesting HPT’s attorney’s rates and hours and arguing that a nominal sanction is

20

sufficient to accomplish the purposes of Rule 11. Dkt. 170.

21
22

Regarding rates, HPT seeks an hourly rate of $350. Defendants cite LHF Prods.,
Inc v. Doe 1, C16-551RSM, 2017 WL 615888 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 15, 2017) for the

ORDER - 1

Case 3:17-cv-05760-BHS Document 187 Filed 08/26/19 Page 2 of 3

1

proposition that a more reasonable hourly rate is $300. Dkt. 170 at 2–3. Chief Judge

2

Martinez, however, stated that “courts in this District have awarded [the attorney] a rate

3

of $350 and $300 for work similar, if not identical, to the [intellectual property] work

4

done in this matter.” Id. at *4. The Court finds that Defendants have failed to show that

5

$350 per hour is an unreasonable rate in this District and therefore grants HPT’s

6

requested hourly rate.

7

Regarding the hours expended, HPT requests 18.3 hours for work in responding to

8

Defendants’ motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and 36.7 hours for work

9

on the motion for sanctions. Dkt. 159-1 at 1–2. Defendants argue that this request is

10

excessive and does not correspond to the Court’s conclusion that it would award only a

11

pro-rata share of fees incurred in responding to Defendants’ motion. Dkt. 170 at 3. The

12

Court agrees with Defendants on both issues. First, Defendants filed the motion for a

13

TRO based on numerous allegedly confidential documents, only one of which led to the

14

offending conduct. Thus, the Court provided that “[w]hile the Court will not award all

15

fees incurred in responding to the [TRO] motion, the Court will award a reasonable

16

proportion of those fees.” Dkt. 155 at 5. This is based on the fact that HPT would have

17

had to respond to the motion even if the offending document and argument relating to

18

that documents were excluded from the motion. Defendants’ motion was based on binary

19

files and two hardware design documents, one of which was not Defendants’ product.

20

Therefore, the Court will reduce the hours requested to award only one-third of those

21

hours, which is 6.1 hours.

22

ORDER - 2

Case 3:17-cv-05760-BHS Document 187 Filed 08/26/19 Page 3 of 3

1

Second, HPT’s request for 36.7 hours for work done on the motion for sanctions is

2

excessive. It is unreasonable to spend twice as many hours on a motion for sanctions as

3

were expended on a response to a motion for a TRO. Moreover, it is unreasonable for an

4

experienced attorney who charges $350 per hour to spend almost an entire week’s worth

5

of work to draft and file a simple motion for sanctions. The Court finds that it would take

6

at most a day to draft and file the motion and a day to read the response and draft a reply.

7

Therefore, the Court awards 16 hours for the motion for sanctions.

8

Finally, Defendants argue that the Court should order them to pay the Court

9

instead of HPT. Dkt. 170 at 6. The Court, however, finds that the sanctionable behavior

10

in this matter resulted in HPT incurring unnecessary expenses, which is sufficient reason

11

to award HPT sanctions for compensation. Therefore, the Court concludes that HPT is

12

awarded sanctions in the amount of $7,735, which is 22.1 hours of work at $350 per hour.

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

Dated this 26th day of August, 2019.

A

15
16

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 3