Nathan v. Berryhill
Filing
12
ORDER Granting 11 Stipulated Motion to Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (KMP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
PAUL ANTHONY NATHAN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
Civil No. 3:17-cv-05780-MAT
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will:
(1) further evaluate the opinion evidence, including the State agency opinions of Renee
19
20
21
Eisenhauer, Ph.D., and Thomas Clifford, Ph.D.;
(2) further evaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity;
(3) continue with the sequential evaluation process, reevaluating Plaintiff’s ability to perform
22
past relevant work and/or other work, and obtaining, if warranted, supplemental
23
vocational evidence; and
24
Page 1
ORDER - [3:17-cv-05780-MAT]
1
(4) issue a new decision.
2
This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds, and Plaintiff is entitled to
3
reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs pursuant to 28
4
U.S.C. § 1920, upon proper request to this Court.
5
DATED this 15th day of February, 2018.
6
A
7
Mary Alice Theiler
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Presented by:
s/ Danielle R. Mroczek
DANIELLE R. MROCZEK
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-2946
Fax: (206) 615-2531
danielle.mroczek@ssa.gov
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [3:17-cv-05780-MAT]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?