McDaniels v. Preito et al

Filing 58

ORDER granting 44 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs. The Court will consider Plaintiff's entire 40-page Motion to Compel when the Court makes its determination. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Peter McDaniels, Prisoner ID: 995036)(CMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 PETER J. MCDANIELS, 11 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING EXCESS PAGES v. 12 CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05801-RBL-DWC KATHLEEN PREITO, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights Complaint 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Excess Pages 18 (“Motion”). Dkt. 44. 1 19 Plaintiff requests leave “to file a 40 page MOTION TO COMPEL [sic] solely based on 20 the fact it is hand written and would otherwise be less than 24 pages.” Dkt. 44. He filed his 4021 page Motion to Compel concurrent with his Motion. Dkt. 42. Defendants have now responded to 22 23 24 1 Also pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 42), Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 47), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 57). The Court will make a determination on those motions in separate Orders or Reports and Recommendations. ORDER GRANTING EXCESS PAGES - 1 1 Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, and addressed the entire 40-page Motion to Compel on the merits. 2 Dkt. 45. Because Defendants have already addressed the entirety of Plaintiff’s Motion to 3 Compel, Plaintiff’s Motion (Dkt. 44) is granted. The Court will consider Plaintiff’s entire 404 page Motion to Compel when the Court makes its determination. 5 Dated this 17th day of October, 2018. A 6 7 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING EXCESS PAGES - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?