Mattison v. Berryhill

Filing 16

ORDER by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision in regard to Plaintiffs application for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a denovo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).(AE)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION 8 9 10 TRAVIS MATTISON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 Civil No. 3:17-CV-05803-MAT ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision 18 in regard to Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social 19 Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de 20 novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Administrative 21 Law Judge shall further evaluate the evidence of record and the claimant’s residual functional 22 capacity, and obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to assist in resolving any 23 conflicts pursuant to Social Security Ruling 00-4p. 24 Page 1 ORDER - [3:17-CV-05803-MAT] 1 DATED this 6th day of April, 2018. 2 A 3 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Presented by: s/ Benjamin J. Groebner BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-2494 Fax: (206) 615-2531 benjamin.groebner@ssa.gov 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER - [3:17-CV-05803-MAT]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?