State of Washington v. The GEO Group Inc

Filing 103

SECOND ORDER on 63 Defendant The GEO Group, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order, 87 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. THE GEO GROUP, INC., CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05806-RJB SECOND ORDER ON DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 THIS MATTER comes before the Court Defendant The GEO Group, Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration. Dkt. 87. In partially reaching the merits of Defendant’s motion, the Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Continuing in Part The GEO Group, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order and Inviting Plaintiff to File Supplemental Response. Dkt. 96. At the Court’s invitation, Plaintiff has filed a Supplemental Response, Dkt. 97, which addresses Defendant’s request to add a paragraph that would modify ¶9 of the Protective Order. See Dkt. 95-3 at 12. 23 24 SECOND ORDER ON DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1 1 Having considered the briefing and the remainder of the file, the Court FINDS that 2 Defendant’s request to modify ¶9 of the Protective Order IS DENIED, and to that extent, 3 Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 87) is HEREBY DENIED. 4 5 This finding shall be construed together with findings in the prior Order (Dkt. 96) as the complete findings on Defendant’s motion. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 8 9 10 11 12 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. Dated this 16th day of August, 2018. A ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SECOND ORDER ON DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?