State of Washington v. The GEO Group Inc
Filing
103
SECOND ORDER on 63 Defendant The GEO Group, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order, 87 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE GEO GROUP, INC.,
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05806-RJB
SECOND ORDER ON
DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP,
INC.’S MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
THIS MATTER comes before the Court Defendant The GEO Group, Inc.’s Motion for
Reconsideration. Dkt. 87. In partially reaching the merits of Defendant’s motion, the Court
issued an Order Granting in Part and Continuing in Part The GEO Group, Inc.’s Motion for
Protective Order and Inviting Plaintiff to File Supplemental Response. Dkt. 96. At the Court’s
invitation, Plaintiff has filed a Supplemental Response, Dkt. 97, which addresses Defendant’s
request to add a paragraph that would modify ¶9 of the Protective Order. See Dkt. 95-3 at 12.
23
24
SECOND ORDER ON DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1
1
Having considered the briefing and the remainder of the file, the Court FINDS that
2
Defendant’s request to modify ¶9 of the Protective Order IS DENIED, and to that extent,
3
Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 87) is HEREBY DENIED.
4
5
This finding shall be construed together with findings in the prior Order (Dkt. 96) as the
complete findings on Defendant’s motion.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and
8
9
10
11
12
to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.
Dated this 16th day of August, 2018.
A
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SECOND ORDER ON DEFENDANT THE GEO GROUP, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?