State of Washington v. The GEO Group Inc

Filing 278

ORDER on 242 , 244 , 255 , 261 Motions to File Amicus Curiae Briefs signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 10 11 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 17-5806 RJB ORDER ON MOTIONS TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS THE GEO GROUP, INC., Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Leave to File Brief of the International Human Rights Clinic at Seattle University School of Law and Global Rights Advocacy as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff (Dkt. 242), the Fair Work Center Legal Clinic and Seattle University Workers’ Rights Clinic Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 244), Motion for Leave to File Brief of La Resistencia as Amici Curiae in support of Plaintiff (Dkt. 255), and the Motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, OneAmerica and Washington Defender Association for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the State of Washington (Dkt. 261) (collectively “Proposed Amici”). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motions and the file herein. 24 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS - 1 1 This case arises out of GEO’s alleged failure to compensate immigration detainees at the 2 Northwest Detention Center (“NDC”), a private detention center, in accord with the Washington 3 Minimum Wage Act (“MWA”). Dkt. 1. 4 5 6 7 I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The facts and procedural history are in the July 1, 2019 Order on Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 243, at 1-3) and are adopted here. The dispositive motions deadline was July 2, 2019. Between July 1, 2019 and July 8, 2019, 8 the Proposed Amici filed their motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs. Dkts. 242, 244, 9 255, and 261. GEO opposes the motions (Dkt. 263); the State does not (Dkt. 264). 10 11 12 II. DISCUSSION A. STANDARD FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS The role of amicus curiae is to “assist[] in a case of general public interest, supplement[] 13 the efforts of counsel, and draw[] the court’s attention to law that escaped consideration.” 14 Miller-Wohl Co., Inc. v. Comm'r of Labor & Indus. State of Mont., 694 F.2d 203, 204 (9th Cir. 15 1982). They are not parties to the case. Id. 16 B. MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEFS 17 The Amici’s motions (Dkts. 242, 244, 255, and 261) should be denied. None of the Proposed 18 Amici meet the requirements of Miller-Wohl - they do not supplement the efforts of the State’s 19 counsel or draw the Court’s attention to relevant law which was not addressed. The Proposed 20 Amici raise claims that are independent from those of the parties in this litigation. They include 21 extra-record facts in the briefs. Insofar as it may be appropriate to add claims or facts, it should 22 be done through the parties’ counsel, so the protections found in due process, the Federal Rules 23 of Civil Procedure relating to discovery, and the Federal Rules of Evidence are assured. While 24 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS - 2 1 the Court has considered each of the Proposed Amici’s briefs, they are not relevant to, and the 2 Court will not consider them, in the decision on the pending motions for summary judgment. 3 III. 4 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 5  ORDER The Motion for Leave to File Brief of the International Human Rights Clinic at 6 Seattle University School of Law and Global Rights Advocacy as Amici Curiae 7 in Support of Plaintiff (Dkt. 242), the Fair Work Center Legal Clinic and Seattle 8 University Workers’ Rights Clinic Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae 9 Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 244), 10 Motion for Leave to File Brief of La Resistencia as Amici Curiae in support of 11 Plaintiff (Dkt. 255), and the Motion of American Civil Liberties Union of 12 Washington, OneAmerica and Washington Defender Association for Leave to 13 File Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the State of Washington (Dkt. 261) ARE 14 DENIED. 15 16 17 18 19 20 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. Dated this 29th day of July, 2019. A ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?