Corey v. Berryhill
Filing
24
ORDER re parties' 23 Stipulated Motion to Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
1
United States District Court Judge Richard A. Jones
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
KODY COREY,
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
12
Defendant.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ
ORDER
14
Based on the stipulation of the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be
15
reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C § 405(g), for
16
further administrative proceedings. The remand is for further administrative proceedings, including
17
18
a de novo hearing. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will be instructed to obtain
evidence from a medical expert, as warranted to address the nature and severity of Plaintiff’s
19
impairments, including, but not limited to, gastroparesis and any related impairments. The ALJ will
20
21
22
also reevaluate Plaintiff’s symptoms, reassess the residual functional capacity, and, if warranted,
obtain vocational expert evidence.
23
///
24
///
25
///
ORDER ON STIPULATION - 1
No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ
Douglas Drachler McKee & Gilbrough, LLP
1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030
Seattle, WA 98101
206-623-0900
1
2
3
Upon proper application, Plaintiff may file a motion for reasonable costs, and attorney fees and
expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
DATED this 27th day of March, 2019.
4
A
5
6
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDER ON STIPULATION - 2
No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ
Douglas Drachler McKee & Gilbrough, LLP
1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030
Seattle, WA 98101
206-623-0900
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?