Corey v. Berryhill

Filing 24

ORDER re parties' 23 Stipulated Motion to Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)

Download PDF
1 United States District Court Judge Richard A. Jones 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 KODY COREY, Plaintiff, 9 10 v. 11 NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 12 Defendant. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ ORDER 14 Based on the stipulation of the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be 15 reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C § 405(g), for 16 further administrative proceedings. The remand is for further administrative proceedings, including 17 18 a de novo hearing. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will be instructed to obtain evidence from a medical expert, as warranted to address the nature and severity of Plaintiff’s 19 impairments, including, but not limited to, gastroparesis and any related impairments. The ALJ will 20 21 22 also reevaluate Plaintiff’s symptoms, reassess the residual functional capacity, and, if warranted, obtain vocational expert evidence. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// ORDER ON STIPULATION - 1 No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ Douglas Drachler McKee & Gilbrough, LLP 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 Seattle, WA 98101 206-623-0900 1 2 3 Upon proper application, Plaintiff may file a motion for reasonable costs, and attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). DATED this 27th day of March, 2019. 4 A 5 6 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER ON STIPULATION - 2 No. 3:17-cv-05807-RAJ Douglas Drachler McKee & Gilbrough, LLP 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 Seattle, WA 98101 206-623-0900

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?