Deem v Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al

Filing 430

ORDER DECONSOLIDATING CASES, REOPENING CASE, REQUESTING RESPONSES, AND RESETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. The Clerk shall reopen 3:18-cv-05527-BHS; and deconsolidate 3:17-cv-05965-BHS and 3:18-cv-05527-BHS; Deem may fi le supplemental responses to the pending summary judgment motions by the Deem 1 defendants, (Dkts. 63 , 65 , 232 , 261 ), no later than January 17, 2020; Defendants may file supplemental replies no later than January 22, 2020; and the pretrial conference is continued to February 3, 2020 at 11:00a m. (**Remaining Deem 2 defendants FMC Corporation and McNally Industries LLC are terminated.)(GMR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 9 SHERRI L. DEEM, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of THOMAS A. DEEM, deceased, Plaintiff, 10 11 v. CASE NO. C17-5965 BHS ORDER DECONSOLIDATING CASES, REOPENING CASE, REQUESTING RESPONSES, AND RESETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Sherri Deem’s, individually and as 15 Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Deem (“Deem”) motion for leave to file 16 supplemental briefing re maritime law, Dkt. 377, the Court’s order denying Deem’s 17 motion to consolidate cases for trial, Dkt. 416, and the parties’ responses regarding 18 deconsolidating cases, Dkts. 424–427. 19 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 20 On November 20, 2017, Deem filed a complaint against Defendants Air & Liquid 21 Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation, Crane Co., Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation, 22 ORDER - 1 1 General Electric Company, IMO Industries, Inc., and Warren Pumps, LLC. Dkt. 1 2 (“Deem 1”). 3 On June 28, 2018, Deem filed a second complaint against Defendants 4 Anchor/Darling Valve Company, BW/IP, Inc., Blackmer Pump Company, Clark- 5 Reliance Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crosby Valve, LLC, Flowserve Corporation, 6 Flowserve US, Inc., FMC Corporation (“FMC”), Gardner Denver, Inc., Goulds Pumps, 7 Inc., Grinnell, LLC, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., ITT, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, 8 Jerguson Gage & Valve, John Crane, Inc., McNally Industries, LLC (“McNally”), Velan 9 Valve Corporation, Viad Corp., Viking Pump, Inc., Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., 10 and The William Powell Company. C18-5527-BHS, Dkt. 1 (“Deem 2”). 11 On December 13, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Deem’s 12 motion to consolidate the cases. Dkt. 52. The Court consolidated the cases through 13 “disposition of summary judgment or such other time prior to trial as the Court deems 14 appropriate” and denied the motion as to the request to consolidate the cases for trial. Id. 15 at 2. 16 On February 27, 2019, FMC and McNally filed a motion for summary judgment 17 arguing that Deem’s claim for wrongful death under Washington law was barred by the 18 statute of limitations. Dkt. 69. On April 25, 2019, the Court granted the motion and 19 dismissed Deem’s Washington law claim against multiple defendants. Dkt. 105. 20 On August 6, 2019, the Court granted Deem’s motion to apply maritime law and 21 granted Deem leave to file an amended complaint to clarify her claims. Dkt. 331. On 22 August 16, 2019, Deem filed amended complaints in both cases. Deem 1, Dkt. 341; ORDER - 2 1 Deem 2, Dkt. 92. On August 19, 2019, the Court struck the amended complaint in Deem 2 1 because only Deem 2 defendants moved to dismiss her complaint. Dkt. 341. 3 4 On August 15, 2019, Deem filed a motion to consolidate the cases for trial. Dkt. 340. 5 6 On August 16, 2019, Deem filed an amended complaint asserting claims for wrongful death under maritime law. Deem 2, Dkt. 92. 7 8 On August 30, 2019, Deem filed a motion for leave to file supplemental briefing re maritime law. Dkt. 377. 9 On January 2, 2020, the Court denied Deem’s motion to consolidate the cases for 10 trial because the Court concluded in other orders that the claims in Deem 2 were time- 11 barred. Dkt. 416. The Court also requested the remaining parties’ positions on whether 12 the matters should be deconsolidated. Id. On January 8, 2020, some parties filed 13 responses. Dkts. 424–427. 14 15 16 II. DISCUSSION A. Consolidation In their responses, the Deem 1 defendants requests that the Court keep the matters 17 consolidated for trial so that the jury may apportion fault among all parties, including 18 those that have settled. Dkts. 424, 425. Defendants, however, fail to articulate why they 19 would not be able to argue apportionment regardless of whether a party settled in Deem 1 20 or Deem 2. In other words, a settlement for the same claim for injuries is relevant 21 regardless of the case number. Thus, the Court finds that the circumstances warrant 22 deconsolidating the matters for further proceedings. ORDER - 3 1 2 B. Maritime Law In Deem 1, Deem seeks leave to file supplemental briefing regarding maritime law 3 because, when Defendants filed motions for summary judgment, it was unclear whether 4 Washington law or maritime law applied to Deem’s claims. Dkt. 377. The Court agrees 5 with Deem that, at least to some motions for summary judgment, it was unclear whether 6 the appropriate causation standard was Washington law or maritime law. Therefore, the 7 Court grants Deem’s motion to supplement her briefing. III. ORDER 8 9 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 10 1) The Clerk shall reopen Deem 2, C18-5527BHS; 11 2) The Clerk shall deconsolidate Deem 1, C17-5965BHS, and Deem 2, C185527BHS; 12 13 3) Deem may file supplemental responses to the pending summary judgment 14 motions by the Deem 1 defendants, Dkts. 63, 65, 232, 261, no later than 15 January 17, 2020; 16 4) Defendants may file supplemental replies no later than January 22, 2020; and 17 5) The pretrial conference is continued to February 3, 2020 at 11:00am. 18 Dated this 9th day of January, 2020. A 19 20 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 21 22 ORDER - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?