Deem v Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
Filing
430
ORDER DECONSOLIDATING CASES, REOPENING CASE, REQUESTING RESPONSES, AND RESETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. The Clerk shall reopen 3:18-cv-05527-BHS; and deconsolidate 3:17-cv-05965-BHS and 3:18-cv-05527-BHS; Deem may fi le supplemental responses to the pending summary judgment motions by the Deem 1 defendants, (Dkts. 63 , 65 , 232 , 261 ), no later than January 17, 2020; Defendants may file supplemental replies no later than January 22, 2020; and the pretrial conference is continued to February 3, 2020 at 11:00a m. (**Remaining Deem 2 defendants FMC Corporation and McNally Industries LLC are terminated.)(GMR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8
9
SHERRI L. DEEM, individually and as
Personal Representative of the estate of
THOMAS A. DEEM, deceased,
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
CASE NO. C17-5965 BHS
ORDER DECONSOLIDATING
CASES, REOPENING CASE,
REQUESTING RESPONSES, AND
RESETTING PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
CORPORATION, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Sherri Deem’s, individually and as
15
Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Deem (“Deem”) motion for leave to file
16
supplemental briefing re maritime law, Dkt. 377, the Court’s order denying Deem’s
17
motion to consolidate cases for trial, Dkt. 416, and the parties’ responses regarding
18
deconsolidating cases, Dkts. 424–427.
19
I.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
20
On November 20, 2017, Deem filed a complaint against Defendants Air & Liquid
21
Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation, Crane Co., Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation,
22
ORDER - 1
1
General Electric Company, IMO Industries, Inc., and Warren Pumps, LLC. Dkt. 1
2
(“Deem 1”).
3
On June 28, 2018, Deem filed a second complaint against Defendants
4
Anchor/Darling Valve Company, BW/IP, Inc., Blackmer Pump Company, Clark-
5
Reliance Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crosby Valve, LLC, Flowserve Corporation,
6
Flowserve US, Inc., FMC Corporation (“FMC”), Gardner Denver, Inc., Goulds Pumps,
7
Inc., Grinnell, LLC, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., ITT, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company,
8
Jerguson Gage & Valve, John Crane, Inc., McNally Industries, LLC (“McNally”), Velan
9
Valve Corporation, Viad Corp., Viking Pump, Inc., Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc.,
10
and The William Powell Company. C18-5527-BHS, Dkt. 1 (“Deem 2”).
11
On December 13, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Deem’s
12
motion to consolidate the cases. Dkt. 52. The Court consolidated the cases through
13
“disposition of summary judgment or such other time prior to trial as the Court deems
14
appropriate” and denied the motion as to the request to consolidate the cases for trial. Id.
15
at 2.
16
On February 27, 2019, FMC and McNally filed a motion for summary judgment
17
arguing that Deem’s claim for wrongful death under Washington law was barred by the
18
statute of limitations. Dkt. 69. On April 25, 2019, the Court granted the motion and
19
dismissed Deem’s Washington law claim against multiple defendants. Dkt. 105.
20
On August 6, 2019, the Court granted Deem’s motion to apply maritime law and
21
granted Deem leave to file an amended complaint to clarify her claims. Dkt. 331. On
22
August 16, 2019, Deem filed amended complaints in both cases. Deem 1, Dkt. 341;
ORDER - 2
1
Deem 2, Dkt. 92. On August 19, 2019, the Court struck the amended complaint in Deem
2
1 because only Deem 2 defendants moved to dismiss her complaint. Dkt. 341.
3
4
On August 15, 2019, Deem filed a motion to consolidate the cases for trial. Dkt.
340.
5
6
On August 16, 2019, Deem filed an amended complaint asserting claims for
wrongful death under maritime law. Deem 2, Dkt. 92.
7
8
On August 30, 2019, Deem filed a motion for leave to file supplemental briefing
re maritime law. Dkt. 377.
9
On January 2, 2020, the Court denied Deem’s motion to consolidate the cases for
10
trial because the Court concluded in other orders that the claims in Deem 2 were time-
11
barred. Dkt. 416. The Court also requested the remaining parties’ positions on whether
12
the matters should be deconsolidated. Id. On January 8, 2020, some parties filed
13
responses. Dkts. 424–427.
14
15
16
II. DISCUSSION
A.
Consolidation
In their responses, the Deem 1 defendants requests that the Court keep the matters
17
consolidated for trial so that the jury may apportion fault among all parties, including
18
those that have settled. Dkts. 424, 425. Defendants, however, fail to articulate why they
19
would not be able to argue apportionment regardless of whether a party settled in Deem 1
20
or Deem 2. In other words, a settlement for the same claim for injuries is relevant
21
regardless of the case number. Thus, the Court finds that the circumstances warrant
22
deconsolidating the matters for further proceedings.
ORDER - 3
1
2
B.
Maritime Law
In Deem 1, Deem seeks leave to file supplemental briefing regarding maritime law
3
because, when Defendants filed motions for summary judgment, it was unclear whether
4
Washington law or maritime law applied to Deem’s claims. Dkt. 377. The Court agrees
5
with Deem that, at least to some motions for summary judgment, it was unclear whether
6
the appropriate causation standard was Washington law or maritime law. Therefore, the
7
Court grants Deem’s motion to supplement her briefing.
III. ORDER
8
9
Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that:
10
1) The Clerk shall reopen Deem 2, C18-5527BHS;
11
2) The Clerk shall deconsolidate Deem 1, C17-5965BHS, and Deem 2, C185527BHS;
12
13
3) Deem may file supplemental responses to the pending summary judgment
14
motions by the Deem 1 defendants, Dkts. 63, 65, 232, 261, no later than
15
January 17, 2020;
16
4) Defendants may file supplemental replies no later than January 22, 2020; and
17
5) The pretrial conference is continued to February 3, 2020 at 11:00am.
18
Dated this 9th day of January, 2020.
A
19
20
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
21
22
ORDER - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?