Hawkins v. Haynes

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING the 18 Report and Recommendation; Hawkins' petition 4 is DENIED; a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; and the Clerk shall enter JUDGMENT and close this case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Charles Hawkins, Prisoner ID: 263451)(CMG) Modified on 6/1/2018: added document relationship (CMG).

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

6
7
8

CHARLES DENNIS HAWKINS,
Petitioner,

9

v.

10

CASE NO. C17-6007 BHS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

RON HAYNES,

11

Respondent.

12
13

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

14

of the Honorable David W. Christel, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 18), and

15

Petitioner Charles Dennis Hawkins’s (“Hawkins”) objections to the R&R (Dkt. 19).

16

On March 30, 2018, Judge Christel issued the R&R recommending that the Court

17

deny Hawkins’s petition on the merits because Hawkins has failed to show that the state

18

court’s adjudication of his due process claim was unreasonable or contrary to federal law.

19

Dkt. 18. On April 11, 2018, Hawkins filed objections. Dkt. 19.

20
21

The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s
disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or

22

ORDER - 1

1

modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the

2

magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

3

In this case, Hawkins objects to the R&R on the grounds that his due process

4

rights have been violated because the Washington Department of Corrections (“DOC”)

5

has failed to accurately calculate his release date. Dkt. 19. The issue is a math problem,

6

and the government has provided an explanation for the problem:

7

15

Hawkins’ sentence is 18,262 days long. Exhibit 12 (“Length In
Days”). Hawkins was given credit for 179 presentence days and 89 jail
good conduct days leaving 17,994 days to serve. Hawkins has 3,823 days
of good conduct time thus far. Subtracting 3,823 days from 17,994 leaves
14,171 days to serve. Had the Department not credited Hawkins’ sentence
with earned time credits as he claims, his earned release date would be
February 2, 2026 (adding 14,171 days to start date of April 17, 1987). That
is not the date the Department calculated for Hawkins’s release.
Rather, the Department calculated an earned early release date of
December 25, 2020. Exhibit 12 (“ERD”). The only way the Department
was able to calculate that release date is by deducting Hawkins’ earned time
credits of 1,730 days he has earned as well as the 135 days he may still earn
from his remaining confinement time. Subtracting 1,865 (1730 + 135) from
14,171 leaves 12,306 days left to serve. [Adding] 12,306 days [to]
Hawkins’ start date of April 17, 1987 results in an earned early release date
of December 25, 2020. This is the date the Department calculated for
Hawkins’ release date. Exhibit 12 (“ERD”).

16

Dkt. 14 at 9. Hawkins contends that this calculation is incorrect. He claims that he

17

should get a 33.3% reduction in time for good behavior and earn an additional 5 days a

18

month off his sentence if he is enrolled in educational or work programs. Dkt. 19 at 1–3;

19

Dkt. 4-1 at 3–4. This calculation, however, appears to violate Washington law. “The

20

statutory maximum for earned release time is ‘one-third of the total sentence.’ Under

21

DOC procedures, ‘earned release time’ is made up of ‘good time’ and ‘earned time.’” In

22

re Forbis, 150 Wn.2d 91, 98 (2003) (citing RCW 9.94A.728(1)). Thus, the Court rejects

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ORDER - 2

1

Hawkins objection that the DOC is failing to credit more than a third of sentence in

2

earned release time.

3

Furthermore, in order to state a federal claim instead of an erroneous application

4

of state law, Hawkins must show that the DOC violated a liberty interest by taking away

5

credits that were earned without due process of law. Hawkins has failed to do so. The

6

record reflects that the DOC has applied every day Hawkins has earned toward reduction

7

of his sentence. Hawkins has failed to produce any evidence to the contrary.

8
9

Accordingly, the Court having considered the R&R, Hawkins’s objections, and the
remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

10

(1)

The R&R is ADOPTED;

11

(2)

Hawkins’s petition (Dkt. 4) is DENIED;

12

(3)

A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; and

13

(4)

The Clerk shall enter JUDGMENT and close this case.

14

Dated this 31st day of May, 2018.

15
16

A

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 3