Linarez v. Haynes

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING the 4 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (Dkt. 1-1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS A SECOND SUCCESSIVE PETITION. The certificate of appealability is DENIED. Petition er's application for in forma pauperis status 1 is DENIED as moot. **SEE ORDER FOR REMAINING DETAILS** Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (Attachments: # 1 Form 12, Application for Leave to File Second Successive, # 2 Circuit Rule 22-3)**10 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jude Linarez, Prisoner ID: 329594)(CMG) Modified on 4/30/2018: added document relationships (CMG).

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 7 8 JUDE MARTIN LINAREZ, Case No. 3:17-cv-06086-RBL-TLF Petitioner, v. RON HAYNES, 9 Respondent. 10 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. Theresa L. 12 Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, 13 and the remaining record, hereby finds and orders: 14 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. (2) Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (Dkt. 1-1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION 17 (3) The certificate of appealability is DENIED. 18 (4) Petitioner’s application for in forma pauperis status (Dkt. 1) is DENIED as moot. (5) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Petitioner, along with copies of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Form 12 – Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 225 and Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3, AND TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THIS FILE. 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED this 30th day of April, 2018. A Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?